On 6/16/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Suppose you've got the following "use case": Install all of
> KDE, but leave out PPP stuff.
>
> How would
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Suppose you've got the following "use case": Install all of
> KDE, but leave out PPP stuff.
>
> How would you solve that?
Intall all the kde*-meta packages except kde-m
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The "ppp" flag is already "known" to portage.
>
> --(
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > and a
> > mechanism to put use flags into split ebuilds and let the devs
> > decide which ones are worth persuing?
>
> With "split ebuilds" you mean for example the ebuild for kppp? Or
> are you talking about the kde*-meta ebuilds?
Sorry for not b
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Perhaps the best route (maybe a good feature request?) is to put
> > USE flags in the -meta ebuilds.
>
> That's what I'd like to get as a result of
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182106
I see we're thinking along the same lines. Now, how
5 matches
Mail list logo
