This might work, but the "correct" way to do this is still a split DNS.
Since this machine is on the border of private/public networks it should
combine the two. Your DNS on this border box should be a slave to the
internal master. These slave records should be restricted to being queries
from
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:38:48 -0400, Mark wrote:
> I receive internet DNS information from the DSL connection, so no
> problem there. But I want my internal connection to know about the
> internal DNS servers as well.
Assuming your internal DNS servers give an almost instant response (they
should
Well, here's the situation. My machine is on a small corporate network
that uses a Microsoft proxy. I am not able to get portage to work, even
with webrsync and even after installing ntlmaps. I also have access to
a DSL connection in the same office. So what I want to do is connect
one NIC to the D
No.
Look into a split DNS setup:
http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2001/00288013.html
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Mark wrote:
Can I specify different DNS servers for each of my two physical interfaces
to use? One nic is configured for DHCP, and the other is static. The DHCP
enabled NIC gets its
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 14:43 -0400, Mark wrote:
> Can I specify different DNS servers for each of my two physical
> interfaces to use? One nic is configured for DHCP, and the other is
> static. The DHCP enabled NIC gets its DNS server list automatically
> and updates (overwrites) /etc/resolv.conf. H
On Sep 22, 2005, at 3:06 PM, gentuxx wrote:Name resolution is name resolution, whether on the static line orthe dynamic line. What difference does it make? If they are on different networks, one interface may not be able tosee the other interface, therefore not the name servers either.Is that true?
> >
> > Name resolution is name resolution, whether on the static line or
> > the dynamic line. What difference does it make?
> >
>
> If they are on different networks, one interface may not be able to
> see the other interface, therefore not the name servers either.
But if one /etc/resolv.conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
>
> Name resolution is name resolution, whether on the static line or
> the dynamic line. What difference does it make?
>
If they are on different networks, one interface may not be able to
see the other interface, therefore n
Name resolution is name resolution,
whether on the static line or the dynamic line. What difference does it
make?
-Original Message-
From: Mark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
September 22, 2005 2:44 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] speci
9 matches
Mail list logo
