Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 and /etc/udev/rules.d/

2013-01-22 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:23:57 + schrieb Neil Bothwick : > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:56:00 -0600, »Q« wrote: > > > Here's /etc/udev/rules.d/12-opticaldrive.rules, just one line: > > > > KERNEL=="sr0", SUBSYSTEM=="block", NAME="opticaldrive", SYMLINK+="%k", > > SYMLINK+="cdrom", SYMLINK+="cdrw", S

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 and /etc/udev/rules.d/

2013-01-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:56:00 -0600, »Q« wrote: > Here's /etc/udev/rules.d/12-opticaldrive.rules, just one line: > > KERNEL=="sr0", SUBSYSTEM=="block", NAME="opticaldrive", SYMLINK+="%k", > SYMLINK+="cdrom", SYMLINK+="cdrw", SYMLINK+="dvd", SYMLINK+="dvdrom", > SYMLINK+="dvdrw" ISTR a change in u

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 and /etc/udev/rules.d/

2013-01-22 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:56:00 -0600 schrieb »Q« : > udev-197-r3 gave me this postinstall warning: > > Upstream has removed the persistent-cd rules generator. If you need > persistent names for these devices, place udev rules for them > in /etc/udev/rules.d. > > Well, I have had such a rule

[gentoo-user] udev-197 and /etc/udev/rules.d/

2013-01-21 Thread »Q«
udev-197-r3 gave me this postinstall warning: Upstream has removed the persistent-cd rules generator. If you need persistent names for these devices, place udev rules for them in /etc/udev/rules.d. Well, I have had such a rule for a long time, and it worked ok until I installed udev-197, wh