On Monday 25 September 2006 17:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:23, Lord Sauron wrote:
> > Ultra-quick question:
> >
> > By unmerging pam-login will I be breaking anything?
>
> you must not log out between unmergin pam-login and emerging shadow.
>
> And that has be
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:30:12 +0200, Lord Sauron wrote:
> Ultra-quick question:
>
> By unmerging pam-login will I be breaking anything?
http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2006/06/01/refreshing-the-pam-login-and-shadow-problem
--
Peter Wu
Powered by Gentoo GNU/Linux 2.6.17
--
gent
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:23, Lord Sauron wrote:
> Ultra-quick question:
>
> By unmerging pam-login will I be breaking anything?
>
you must not log out between unmergin pam-login and emerging shadow.
And that has been written douzends of time.
Maybe you search the archives next time?
--
g
Ultra-quick question:
By unmerging pam-login will I be breaking anything?
It's preventing a emerge --newuse system (and later a emerge --newuse
world) that's I'm preparing to do over the weekend (and to see if I can
get distcc working between my server and workstation to support my poor
laptop
On Thursday 01 June 2006 18:28, JimD wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > education?
>
> I have a formal education. I do not need any "pointers" from you, thanks.
>
> > it is just plain laziness to ask a question in a mailing list or forum,
> > that could have been aswered by typing three wor
JimD wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
education?
I think he meant education of the others asking questions that are
easily googled though I read it the way you interpreted the first time
as well.
I agree that it is easily googled, *but* I can see why people might want
a bit of hand
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> education?
I have a formal education. I do not need any "pointers" from you, thanks.
> it is just plain laziness to ask a question in a mailing list or forum, that
> could have been aswered by typing three words into google search.
Talking about education, usual
On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:40, JimD wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > if you have used google, you wouldn't had to ask here. Saving you some
> > time and a lot of people some bandwidth.
>
> If you are so concerned about others bandwidth, then why waste it to
> troll? If you had read the t
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> if you have used google, you wouldn't had to ask here. Saving you some time
> and a lot of people some bandwidth.
If you are so concerned about others bandwidth, then why waste it to
troll? If you had read the thread, you would have seen that plenty of
people resp
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 21:22, William Meertens wrote:
> Look who's having a bad day :-) today. Tomorrow it all will be better. Is
> it raining with you too for a long time now ?
for 29 days now.
Today was very unpleasant. After 10m, my jeans were completly wet...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mail
Look who's having a bad day :-) today. Tomorrow it all will be better. Is it
raining with you too for a long time now ?
On Wed, 31 May 2006 20:48:52 +0200
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Re: [gentoo-user]
sys-apps/pam-login :
> On Wednesday 31 Ma
On Wed, 31 May 2006, William Meertens wrote:
> > Take a look at the following page, it will tell you what you need to do.
> >
> > http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2006/03/19/the_shadow_and_pam_login_conflict
>
> This explains it all, only I'm still curious why even with version 6.0
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 19:00, JimD wrote:
> I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
>
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/pam-login (is blocking sys-apps/shadow-4.0.15-
> Take a look at the following page, it will tell you what you need to do.
>
> http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2006/03/19/the_shadow_and_pam_login_conflict
This explains it all, only I'm still curious why even with version 6.0 I'm
still getting both installed just fine. Hardly look
William Meertens wrote:
Second when removing one of the two, you could face the fact that you can't
login into your system. Which would sound normal because both are more or less
responsible for your login and therefor like you say part of your system.
This happened to me last night. Fixed b
JimD wrote:
> I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
>
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/pam-login (is blocking sys-apps/shadow-4.0.15-r2)
>
> Do I need to remove
JimD wrote:
> I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
>
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/pam-login (is blocking sys-apps/shadow-4.0.15-r2)
>
> Do I need to remove
4 -0400
JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [gentoo-user] sys-apps/pam-login :
> I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
>
> [blocks B ]
Take a look at the following page, it will tell you what you need to do.
http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2006/03/19/the_shadow_and_pam_login_conflict
On Thursday, 1 June 2006 2:30, JimD wrote:
> I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
>
> These are the packages
JimD wrote:
> I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
>
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/pam-login (is blocking sys-apps/shadow-4.0.15-r2)
>
> Do I need to remove
I get this message when trying to do an emerge -vpuDN world:
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
[blocks B ] sys-apps/pam-login (is blocking sys-apps/shadow-4.0.15-r2)
Do I need to remove sys-apps/shadow? I thought th
21 matches
Mail list logo
