Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-28 Thread Walter Dnes
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:20:57AM -0400, dhk wrote > The first one (0.11.2) didn't work, but the second one (0.11.6) did. Now > revdep-rebuild completes and all is clean. Should this be posted on > bugzilla as a temporary solution? If you can tell them that this ebuild is working for you wit

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-25 Thread dhk
Walter Dnes wrote: After a few more minutes of looking at the bug list, it appears that it's caused by the stable build being rusty. Given the references to "lib64" in your output, I assume you're running on amd64. Is that correct? If so, a quick-n-dirty workaround might be to add the follow

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:35:41 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > It looks like the bugreport at... > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263562 is identical to yours. No > solutions proposed yet. But do check that URL daily. Or add yourself to the bug's CC list to get an email hen anything happens

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-24 Thread Walter Dnes
After a few more minutes of looking at the bug list, it appears that it's caused by the stable build being rusty. Given the references to "lib64" in your output, I assume you're running on amd64. Is that correct? If so, a quick-n-dirty workaround might be to add the following line to your /etc

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-24 Thread dhk
Walter Dnes wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:25:05PM -0400, dhk wrote It looks like the bugreport at... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263562 is identical to yours. No solutions proposed yet. But do check that URL daily. It's the most likely place to find a fix to your problem.

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-24 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:25:05PM -0400, dhk wrote It looks like the bugreport at... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263562 is identical to yours. No solutions proposed yet. But do check that URL daily. It's the most likely place to find a fix to your problem. Out of sheer curiousi

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-21 Thread dhk
Walter Dnes wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:44:04PM -0400, dhk wrote revdep-rebuild is flagging rhythmbox as requiring libtotem-plparser.so.10 . After the last upgrade all I have installed in /usr/lib64/ is libtotem-plparser.so.12 . Should I just make a link or do I need to install an older

Re: [gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-15 Thread Walter Dnes
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:44:04PM -0400, dhk wrote > revdep-rebuild is flagging rhythmbox as requiring > libtotem-plparser.so.10 . After the last upgrade all I have installed > in /usr/lib64/ is libtotem-plparser.so.12 . Should I just make a link > or do I need to install an older version? or s

[gentoo-user] rhythmbox is looking for an older shared object

2009-03-13 Thread dhk
revdep-rebuild is flagging rhythmbox as requiring libtotem-plparser.so.10 . After the last upgrade all I have installed in /usr/lib64/ is libtotem-plparser.so.12 . Should I just make a link or do I need to install an older version? or should I wait for a rhythmbax update? Other similar files in