On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:30 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
> >> which found nothing to to.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
>> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
>> execute revdep-rebui
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
> execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages
> were fo
Greetings,
after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages
were found and emerged.
Now, shouldn't these have been found already by
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:42:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 1. It's an orphan, left over from an unmerge that wasn't fully
> successful. if you don't need them, delete them.
> 2. A package was installed, and it created it's own binaries for it's
> own use. Portage didn't put them there so doesn't
On Monday 19 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 2/19/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 19 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >I'm not clear why revdep-rebuild is showing lots of broken
> > > linkages but then telling me everything is in order and there
Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
All options being passed to revdep-rebuild are also passed to emerge.
So write only
revdep-rebuild instead of revdep-rebuild -p (pretend)
How would that help the OP? If it finds nothing to emerge with the -p
option, removing it will do nothing - other than waste some t
On Monday 19 February 2007, "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild question':
> On 2/19/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 19 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > >I'm
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I'm not clear why revdep-rebuild is showing lots of broken linkages
but then telling me everything is in order and there is no work to do
to clean up the system.
I haven't seen this before. What's causing it?
What's the process to get this cleaned up and down to no
On 2/19/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 19 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>I'm not clear why revdep-rebuild is showing lots of broken
> linkages but then telling me everything is in order and there is no
> work to do to clean up the system.
>
>I haven't see
On Monday 19 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>I'm not clear why revdep-rebuild is showing lots of broken
> linkages but then telling me everything is in order and there is no
> work to do to clean up the system.
>
>I haven't seen this before. What's causing it?
>
>What's the pro
Hi,
I'm not clear why revdep-rebuild is showing lots of broken linkages
but then telling me everything is in order and there is no work to do
to clean up the system.
I haven't seen this before. What's causing it?
What's the process to get this cleaned up and down to no messages
about broke
12 matches
Mail list logo
