Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

2009/1/19 Dave Jones : > Mick wrote on 19/01/09 11:31: >> Unfortunately mine is not as easy: >> == [snip ...] >> == >> >> I am running vlc-0.9.8a which is the only one available. How could I >> go about this? >> > > I had a similar p

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Nickolas Fortino schrieb: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:11 AM, KH > wrote: > > Daniel Pielmeier schrieb: > > 2009/1/19 KH >: > > > >> This link was great help for me. Told me everything and how to >

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:11 AM, KH wrote: > Daniel Pielmeier schrieb: > > 2009/1/19 KH : > > > >> This link was great help for me. Told me everything and how to read the > >> blocker. So I did: > >> > >> #emerge -avC qt-4.3.3 > >> #emerge -DuavN world (This installed qt-4.4.2) > >> > >> But now

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:36:58 -0800, Nickolas Fortino wrote: > using --with-bdeps=y would certainly work (and in the interest of full > disclosure is what I do), but it shouldn't be necessary. > Having emerge --depclean remove build dependencies should be ok. > Afterwards, emerge -avuDN world sho

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

2009/1/20 KH : > > Hi, > > yes I had the blocker when running emerge -DuavN world . I unmerged > qt-4.3* and ran emerge -DuavN world again. That brought in the qt-4.4.2. > Tho investigate further: > > equery d x11-libs/qt > [ Searching for packages depending on x11-libs/qt... ] > app-crypt/pinentry

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Daniel Pielmeier schrieb: > 2009/1/19 KH : > >> This link was great help for me. Told me everything and how to read the >> blocker. So I did: >> >> #emerge -avC qt-4.3.3 >> #emerge -DuavN world (This installed qt-4.4.2) >> >> But now I do have a problem. When I run >> >> #emerge --depclean -av >

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

2009/1/19 KH : > > This link was great help for me. Told me everything and how to read the > blocker. So I did: > > #emerge -avC qt-4.3.3 > #emerge -DuavN world (This installed qt-4.4.2) > > But now I do have a problem. When I run > > #emerge --depclean -av > > I receive the following output: > [sn

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Dale wrote: > > It's sort of funny in a way. I hardly ever go to the Gentoo website. I > follow this list and -dev and learn that way. I can understand that. I sort of operate that way. I think that there really is a next step which is when you hit a problem li

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, KH > wrote: > > Mark Knecht schrieb: > >> Hi, > >>I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the > >> blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to > >> read this? > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Dale wrote: > > >> Hence the question, should this be a default option? I'm not the only >> one that has ran into this. >> >> Dale >> > > Maybe it's a forest for trees thing but it's in the man page and shows > up early in Gentoo Port

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:18:10 -0600, Dale wrote: > > Could also be that you don't have slots defined for some of those in > > your world? for example do you have qt or qt:3 etc? > I don't appear to have anything qt related in my world file. Nor should you. Unless you are developing QT software, o

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Dale wrote: > > Hence the question, should this be a default option? I'm not the only > one that has ran into this. > > Dale Maybe it's a forest for trees thing but it's in the man page and shows up early in Gentoo Portage documentation: http://www.gentoo.org/p

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Dale wrote: > >> >> +1 I added that to my make.conf a while ago and it helped with a lot of >> this sort of thing. Wonder if it should be a default thing? >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> >> >> > > Could also be that you don't have slots

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Dale wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, KH wrote: >> >>> Mark Knecht schrieb: >>> Hi, I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to >>

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, KH wrote: > >> Mark Knecht schrieb: >> >>> Hi, >>>I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the >>> blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to >>> read this? >>> >>>Are there really applic

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, KH wrote: > Mark Knecht schrieb: >> Hi, >>I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the >> blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to >> read this? >> >>Are there really application packages that cannot be installed a

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Mark Knecht schrieb: > Hi, >I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the > blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to > read this? > >Are there really application packages that cannot be installed at > the same or is only about qt and possibly the US

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Monday 19 January 2009 13:58:26 Dave Jones wrote: > Mick wrote on 19/01/09 11:31: > > 2009/1/18 Mark Knecht : > >> Indeed, I do have 4.3.3 installed and it is masked. I guess this > >> must be one of those cases where the devs decided they didn't like > >> something they used to like as I didn

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Mick wrote on 19/01/09 11:31: > 2009/1/18 Mark Knecht : > > >> Indeed, I do have 4.3.3 installed and it is masked. I guess this >> must be one of those cases where the devs decided they didn't like >> something they used to like as I didn't do anything to unmask it >> myself. >> >> I removed

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

2009/1/18 Mark Knecht : > Indeed, I do have 4.3.3 installed and it is masked. I guess this > must be one of those cases where the devs decided they didn't like > something they used to like as I didn't do anything to unmask it > myself. > > I removed it and the blockages for emerge system have

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Christopher Walters wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Mark Knecht wrote: >> Hi, >>I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the >> blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to >> read this? >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, >I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the > blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to > read this? > >Are there really application packages that cannot be installed at >

[gentoo-user] qt blockages...

Hi, I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to read this? Are there really application packages that cannot be installed at the same or is only about qt and possibly the USE flags I've got? I tried remo