On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:06:17 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> > When you think about it, the very name "overlay" indicates that this
> > is how it should work.
>
> I suppose there's no way to avoid there being *some* issue-- this way,
> you have to actively watch Portage to see if today is perhaps
Fernando Canizo schreef:
>> Is this a behaviour that a significant portion of the mutt userbase
>> might want? Or are you just weird ;) ?
>
>
> Well, you use thunderbird, so maybe you're more like a "mouse user".
Yes, but I'm getting over it. Also I need to know how to work with at
least one C
Neil Bothwick schreef:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:42:16 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>> But do you know the answer to Nick's question about what I said
>> earlier? In a 'conflict' between two ebuilds of the same name and
>> version, one in Portage and one in the overlay, does the choice of
>>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:42:16 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> But do you know the answer to Nick's question about what I said earlier?
> In a 'conflict' between two ebuilds of the same name and version, one in
> Portage and one in the overlay, does the choice of which one is used if
> I emerge the re
El 31/ago/2005 a las 08:39 -0300, Holly me decía:
> The probelm here is (likely) that the name of the package (for the
> purposes of the ebuild) is 'mutt-conan', not mutt.
>
> The format for an overlay folder (like Portage) is
>
> cat-egory/package-name/package-name.and-version.ebuild
>
> so you
El 31/ago/2005 a las 03:37 -0300, Nick me decía:
> no no, you put the epatch command in your ebuild file (your own version
> that you put in PORTAGE_OVERLAY.) Then the patch gets applied to the
> mutt source file before compilation.
Ah... Already did that! In my modified ebuild what i did was to
Neil Bothwick schreef:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:39:04 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>>Or, if there's some way to 'modularize' mutt, you could look into
>>turning the patch into a 'plugin' (if such things exist, I know nothing
>>about mutt), so that it would be optional to those who wanted to us
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:39:04 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Or, if there's some way to 'modularize' mutt, you could look into
> turning the patch into a 'plugin' (if such things exist, I know nothing
> about mutt), so that it would be optional to those who wanted to use it.
Or you could add a USE
Fernando Canizo schreef:
> El 30/ago/2005 a las 22:36 -0300, Holly me decía:
>
>>Normally what one would do is place all modified ebuilds in your
>>PORTDIR_OVERLAY ...
>
>
> Thank you very much. You should take advice from Nick and make it a howto. I'm
> surely going to translate to spanish and
For a _great_ place to read about ebuilds go to:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/devmanual/
It has next to everything :)
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 02:56 -0300, Fernando Canizo wrote:
> El 31/ago/2005 a las 00:23 -0300, Nick me decía:
> > 2. Fernando might like to note that the way to introduce a patch to a
> > package (rather than an amendment to the ebuild) is to use the epatch
> > command. Commonly the line looks like
El 31/ago/2005 a las 00:23 -0300, Nick me decía:
> 2. Fernando might like to note that the way to introduce a patch to a
> package (rather than an amendment to the ebuild) is to use the epatch
> command. Commonly the line looks like this:
You're saying that i can emerge mutt, run epatch command an
El 30/ago/2005 a las 22:36 -0300, Holly me decía:
> Normally what one would do is place all modified ebuilds in your
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY ...
Thank you very much. You should take advice from Nick and make it a howto. I'm
surely going to translate to spanish and put it in my blog, maybe i would add
so
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:36:57 +0200
Holly Bostick wrote:
> Fernando Canizo schreef:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I find a cute patch to mutt and to use it i modified the ebuild and
> > the pertinent files so now re-emerging mutt builds mutt with this
> > patch. Later i fixed the actual version of mutt so
Fernando Canizo schreef:
> Hi all,
>
> I find a cute patch to mutt and to use it i modified the ebuild and
> the pertinent files so now re-emerging mutt builds mutt with this
> patch. Later i fixed the actual version of mutt so an upgrade cannot
> erase it.
>
> What i would like to know is how c
Hi all,
I find a cute patch to mutt and to use it i modified the ebuild and
the pertinent files so now re-emerging mutt builds mutt with this
patch. Later i fixed the actual version of mutt so an upgrade cannot
erase it.
What i would like to know is how can i do this i a 'gentoo way'. I
have lis
16 matches
Mail list logo
