Re: [gentoo-user] meta-packages and buildpkgonly

2009-02-02 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Roy Wright wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> >> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:14:34 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote: >> >>> nice -19 emerge -j4 --buildpgkonly kde-base/kde-meta >>> >>> but it takes next to no time instead of hours and >>> hasn't build the binary package

Re: [gentoo-user] meta-packages and buildpkgonly

2009-02-02 Thread Roy Wright
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:14:34 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote: nice -19 emerge -j4 --buildpgkonly kde-base/kde-meta but it takes next to no time instead of hours and hasn't build the binary packages without any error messages. What am I missing? --buildpkg only works i

Re: [gentoo-user] meta-packages and buildpkgonly

2009-02-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:05:45 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > --buildpkg only works if the dependent packages are installed, Sorry, wrong way round, I meant dependencies, not dependent packages. -- Neil Bothwick God made wrinkles to show where smiles have been. signature.asc Description: PGP si

Re: [gentoo-user] meta-packages and buildpkgonly

2009-02-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:14:34 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > nice -19 emerge -j4 --buildpgkonly kde-base/kde-meta > > but it takes next to no time instead of hours and > hasn't build the binary packages without any error messages. > What am I missing? --buildpkg only works if the dependent

[gentoo-user] meta-packages and buildpkgonly

2009-02-02 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, again for the kde upgrade I'd like to prepare the upgrade by build all necessary binary packages and do the real update some times later when it doesn't matter if the machine is down for some time Using portage 2.2_rc23 I've just tried nice -19 emerge -j4 --buildpgkonly kde-base/kde-meta bu