Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-08-02 Thread Ajai Khattri
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Dan Farrell wrote: hmm... network booting? network mounting? install packages once on one system, share them with everyone. Share passwd/shadow files and the like manually, or symlink them to skeletal versions symlinked to somewhere that can be obscured and replaced by a

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Dan Farrell
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:57:48 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > Dealing with unexpected side > effects of syncing in-use files could be a lot more problematic. perhaps a digest of some kind? md5 the files, write up a little script to keep the rest of the nodes synced up?

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Dan Farrell
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files > /etc/conf.d/hostname > /etc/conf.d/net > > I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating > GenToo upto several times a week) > and 'rsync' the other ones.

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:46:17 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > No, on the 'master' machine I have in /etc/make.conf > FEATURES="buildpkg -stricter" > > and on the clones I use '-k'. > > But still, portage checks dependencies on the clone. > And, if it sees a problem (like those when upgradi

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 31 Jul, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:59:02 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > >> I've done so in the past but I've made bad experience. >> Unfortunately portage isn't so clever, yet. > > portage is a lot cleverer than it used to be, especially with regard to > blocks. Yes

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:59:02 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > I've done so in the past but I've made bad experience. > Unfortunately portage isn't so clever, yet. portage is a lot cleverer than it used to be, especially with regard to blocks. > Many times (on the 'clones', as well) I had t

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files > /etc/conf.d/hostname > /etc/conf.d/net > > I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating > GenToo upto several times a week) > and 'rsync' the other ones. > > Now,

Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 31 Jul, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > >> I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files >> /etc/conf.d/hostname >> /etc/conf.d/net >> >> I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating >> GenToo upto several times a wee

[gentoo-user] maintaining clones

2009-07-31 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files /etc/conf.d/hostname /etc/conf.d/net I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating GenToo upto several times a week) and 'rsync' the other ones. Now, rsync'ing a life root filesystem is risky. I don't see any problems for the FS