On Sat, 14 May 2016 18:23:10 +0200, hw wrote:
> >> Using 'chmod -R g+w $#' isn't very appealing, and how safely does it
> >> handle file names?
> >
> > What is unappealing about it? I've never had any problem with file
> > names, but I don't use odd ones. You could quote the $@/$# just in
> > ca
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
On 07/05/2016 17:12, hw wrote:
Michael Orlitzky schrieb:
On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
a very simple thing to accomplish.
I
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:42:56 +0200, hw wrote:
I've done this with ACLs in the past, which is why I suggested it, but
it's a pain to set up if you haven't used them before. Alan's
suggestion of using inotify is probably simplest. Install incrond and
put something like this
On 07/05/2016 17:12, hw wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky schrieb:
>> On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
>>>
>>> Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
>>> files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
>>> a very simple thing to accomplish.
>>>
>>
>> It
Michael Orlitzky schrieb:
On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
a very simple thing to accomplish.
It was never possible. It's ridiculous, but there it is.
On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
> files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
> a very simple thing to accomplish.
>
It was never possible. It's ridiculous, but there it is. The UNIX
permissio
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:42:56 +0200, hw wrote:
> > I've done this with ACLs in the past, which is why I suggested it, but
> > it's a pain to set up if you haven't used them before. Alan's
> > suggestion of using inotify is probably simplest. Install incrond and
> > put something like this in a file
hw schrieb:
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
every file ev
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
every file ev
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
> > files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
> > user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
> > every file every time)
Hi,
how can I make it so that multiple users on a system who create
files in a local, shared directory do have write access to files
created by other users within the shared directory?
The directory is group-writeable, and the users belong to the group
which owns the directory. This enables th
On 03/17/2016 06:38 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
> Actually, this is completely viable...
>
> If users chmod a file then tell them not to. If you must, set up some
> cron job to clean up after them.
>
> But, you can of course do this with
On 17/03/2016 19:19, hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> how can I make it so that multiple users on a system who create
> files in a local, shared directory do have write access to files
> created by other users within the shared directory?
>
> The directory is group-writeable, and the users belong to the gr
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:19:21 +0100, hw wrote:
> how can I make it so that multiple users on a system who create
> files in a local, shared directory do have write access to files
> created by other users within the shared directory?
ACLs.
--
Neil Bothwick
And if you say "No", I shall be force
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all files
> a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the user
> (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod every file
> every time) and c) y
16 matches
Mail list logo
