On 24/01/2014 20:44, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
>> different.
>
> Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang
> alone llvm i n
> FreeBSD use it > and say is stable. FreeBSD maybe not the reference on earth
> but the > BSD's make a good job. When i saw all versions of Clang is masked.
> > Isn't FBSD more similar than, say, Linux, to what OSX is, sort of? I could
> be way off. But I think of OSX as being FBSD built for pe
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100
Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something
> > very
different.
>
> Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install
> cl
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
> different.
Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang
alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm too but i has not set the
use
On 24/01/2014 02:01, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ok the version 3.3 run without problems, i think the 3.4. make troubles
> and the package Maintainer from Gentoo has hardmasked.
llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
different.
The mistake you made is using
Hello,
ok the version 3.3 run without problems, i think the 3.4. make troubles
and the package Maintainer from Gentoo has hardmasked.
Thank you for help & Nice Day
Silvio
Hello,
i try to install llvm but it broke with:
-- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG - Failed
-- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG
-- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG - Failed
-- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_NON_VIRTUAL_DTOR_FLAG
7 matches
Mail list logo
