Jorge Morais wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:48:22 -0400
> Eric Martin wrote:
>
>> Also, the kernel is the last place that you want to drag
>> your feet for updates. If there's a bug in the kernel I want to have it
>> fixed asap. Granted you can also argue that I'm injecting buggy code.
>> It's
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:48:22 -0400
Eric Martin wrote:
> Also, the kernel is the last place that you want to drag
> your feet for updates. If there's a bug in the kernel I want to have it
> fixed asap. Granted you can also argue that I'm injecting buggy code.
> It's two sides of the same coin.
>
Jorge Morais wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:36:41 +0500
> Mike Kazantsev wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:38 -0300
>> Jorge Morais wrote:
>>
>>> If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I assume you would
>>> have read about the release, and thus would know about Tuz.
>>> So you up
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:59:02 -0300
Jorge Morais wrote:
> > It's still a way to check out these new features hands-on :)
>
> It's a kernel.
Exactly.
That's definitely one of the thing you have to know about, especially
if this one's got some unpredictable stuff in it.
> Even if it already releas
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:36:41 +0500
Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:38 -0300
> Jorge Morais wrote:
>
> > If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I assume you would
> > have read about the release, and thus would know about Tuz.
> > So you upgraded to a ~arch kernel wit
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:38 -0300
Jorge Morais wrote:
> If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I assume you would
> have read about the release, and thus would know about Tuz.
> So you upgraded to a ~arch kernel without any need.
> Why?
The question is probably not adressed to me, but
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:38 -0300, Jorge Morais wrote:
> If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I assume you would
> have read about the release, and thus would know about Tuz.
> So you upgraded to a ~arch kernel without any need.
> Why?
Because if no one runs the testing packages, the
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:50:46 +0200
Thanasis wrote:
> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
>
> Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
>
>
If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I as
Thanasis wrote:
Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
Here's my link on the subject:
http://torvalds-family.blogspot.com/2009/03/new-logo.html
--J
on 03/26/2009 02:22 AM Jerry McBride wrote the following:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 05:51:30 pm Thanasis wrote:
>
>> on 03/25/2009 11:04 PM Alan McKinnon wrote the following:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:50:46 Thanasis wrote:
>>>
Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.2
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 05:51:30 pm Thanasis wrote:
> on 03/25/2009 11:04 PM Alan McKinnon wrote the following:
> > On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:50:46 Thanasis wrote:
> >> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> >> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
> >>
> >
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 23:51:30 Thanasis wrote:
> on 03/25/2009 11:04 PM Alan McKinnon wrote the following:
> > On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:50:46 Thanasis wrote:
> >> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> >> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
> >>
> >> W
on 03/25/2009 11:04 PM Alan McKinnon wrote the following:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:50:46 Thanasis wrote:
>
>> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
>> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
>>
>> Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:50:46 Thanasis wrote:
> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
>
> Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
It's not a mouse, it's a Tasmanian Devil which isn't a roden
Thanasis schrieb am 25.03.2009 21:50:
> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
>
> Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
>
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/tux-takes-tasmanian-vacation
Rega
Thanasis schrieb:
> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
>
> Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
>
>
>
Hi,
Tux is on vacation for 2.6.29 He will be back in some month. Tuz is a
animal whic
Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
17 matches
Mail list logo
