Afair icedtea, openjdk, jdk share a Lot of Code.
Am 16.01.2013 15:18 schrieb "Michael Mol" :
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Daniel Campbell
> wrote:
> > On 01/15/2013 11:32 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 10:32:11 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
> >>> I'm cur
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 11:32 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 10:32:11 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
>>> I'm curious as well about the potential exploitability of icedtea. I
>>> would think that since the icedtea vm
On 01/15/2013 11:32 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 10:32:11 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
>> I'm curious as well about the potential exploitability of icedtea. I
>> would think that since the icedtea vm is not the same as the sun/oracle
>> one and so I don't think
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 10:32:11 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
> I'm curious as well about the potential exploitability of icedtea. I
> would think that since the icedtea vm is not the same as the sun/oracle
> one and so I don't think the code base is the same, which would mean an
> exploi
I'm curious as well about the potential exploitability of icedtea. I
would think that since the icedtea vm is not the same as the sun/oracle
one and so I don't think the code base is the same, which would mean an
exploit in the sun/oracle jvm would not necessarily affect icedtea.
However, I know ve
Looking for comments:
A while back I removed java during an upgrade on my main desktop system
and left icedtea6-bin in place without any noticeable effect.
Presumably icedtea6 suffers the same java bug (cant find anything in
their bugzilla though?) thats got everybody riled at the moment, though
6 matches
Mail list logo
