On 8/30/20 10:02 PM, n952162 wrote:
In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it.
Out of desperation, I've found out a workaround to this. This
workaround suggests that it's a (introduced) bug in the program, because
I can't make out any logic to it.
im-display-eg-200913-1.png shows how the background is a not transparent
but a single color from the original background. Note
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:00:38AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> > > In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
> > > image edit draw function, it includes an opaque b
On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves. I've never had this w
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
> image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
> just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before,
First you use draw,
In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it. That suggests to me that
it's - aga
6 matches
Mail list logo
