Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:52:18 -0600 Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Rösner wrote: >> Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> My normal >>>emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world >>> showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with >>> >>> These are the packages

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Dale
Thomas Rösner wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> My normal >>emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world >> showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with >> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: >> >> Calculating world dependen

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:22:20 +0100 Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> My normal >>emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world >> showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with >> >> These are the packages that would be merged

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Thomas Rösner
Allan Gottlieb wrote: My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [blocks B ] D

[gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [blocks B ] >> These are the packages that