> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 12:21 +0700, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote:
>> Yes, but it seems 0.0.21 is not even released, because there is no
>> files to fetch
>> from ftp.gimp.org for this version.
>
> Well, sometimes that happens when you build from trunk (and why it's
> usually discouraged).
That is not
On 27 Oct, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:05:16PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
>> > version in ports is 0.0.20 but
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 12:21 +0700, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote:
> Yes, but it seems 0.0.21 is not even released, because there is no
> files to fetch
> from ftp.gimp.org for this version.
Well, sometimes that happens when you build from trunk (and why it's
usually discouraged).
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but it seems 0.0.21 is not even released, because there is no files to
> fetch
> from ftp.gimp.org for this version.
>
Dunno, perhaps they rely on SVN version. I would try to compile the
code "manually", and see i
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:05:16PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
> > version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp- requires >=0.0.21. Have I any
> >
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nickolay Hodyunya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
> version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp- requires >=0.0.21. Have I any chance
> to see this version in ports tree?
>
Did you try renaming the geg
I was trying to compile latest gimp from svn, but it fail because gegl
version in ports is 0.0.20 but gimp- requires >=0.0.21. Have I any chance
to see this version in ports tree?
--
Regards, Nickolay Hodyunya.
7 matches
Mail list logo