On 4/3/06, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You've gotten very lucky. There is a reason that opera provides
> > separate downloads for systems with libstdc++.so.5 and .6. Try
> > searching their forums.
>
> So would it not be a good idea
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You've gotten very lucky. There is a reason that opera provides
> separate downloads for systems with libstdc++.so.5 and .6. Try
> searching their forums.
So would it not be a good idea for portage to install the appropriate
version depending on whet
no, thanks you've been a great help :)
--another happy gentoo userOn 4/3/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/3/06, Leigh Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> skype seems to be linked to libstdc++.so.6. (its a binary) would it hurt to> switch to gcc3.4 just to compile libstdc++.so.6 so
On 4/3/06, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a system with gcc >= 3.4, opera is linked against both
> libstdc++.so.5 (from the distributed binary) and libstdc++.so.6 (from
> natively compiled libraries) but this does not seem to prevent it from
> running.
You've gotten very lucky. The
On 4/3/06, Leigh Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> skype seems to be linked to libstdc++.so.6. (its a binary) would it hurt to
> switch to gcc3.4 just to compile libstdc++.so.6 so that skype has something
> to link to, and then switch back?
You can definitely do this. You can install gcc 3.4
skype seems to be linked to libstdc++.so.6. (its a binary) would
it hurt to switch to gcc3.4 just to compile libstdc++.so.6 so that
skype has something to link to, and then switch back? On 4/3/06, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:> The problem is
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is the libstdc++ library. If you don't at least do the
> revdep-rebuild, you could end up with some things that are linked
> against both libstdc++.so.6 and libstdc++.so.5, and they will crash
> miserably.
On a system with gcc >= 3.4, oper
On 4/3/06, Leigh Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is the version of libstdc++.so which is linked to determined by the
> compiler currently in use as determined by gcc-config?
Yes.
> is it not possible to
> have different programs run against different versions of c++ shared
> libraries?
Dif
On 4/2/06, Leigh Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks richard.
>
> is it safe to have compiled half a system with gcc 3.3 ubt to be compiling
> new packages with 3.4?
No, that's a very bad idea. It should not be necessary to rebuild the
whole system with the new compiler, but you should a
yeah no what im really asking is am i going to run into problems if i
'upgrade' to gcc3.4 and do not, as recommended in the notes that are
displayed after emerging gcc3.4, recompile all my c++ packages with
gcc3.4.
is the version of libstdc++.so which is linked to determined by the
compiler curren
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:00:39 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
> From what I read, if you have half a package using gcc3.3 and the
> other half 3.4 or something, that won't work.
If that were true, how would the system function while recompiling the
other half of the packages?
There may be some issues wi
On 4/2/06, Leigh Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks richard.
>
> is it safe to have compiled half a system with gcc 3.3 ubt to be compiling
> new packages with 3.4?
>From what I read, if you have half a package using gcc3.3 and the
other half 3.4 or something, that won't work. However,
thanks richard.
is it safe to have compiled half a system with gcc 3.3 ubt to be compiling new packages with 3.4?On 4/2/06, Richard Fish <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 4/1/06, Leigh Stewart <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I just tried to install skype, it wont start, and in the logs it tells me it> ca
On 4/1/06, Leigh Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried to install skype, it wont start, and in the logs it tells me it
> cant find libstdc++.so.6, which doesnt surprise me because it doesnt exist
> on my system.
>
> im using gcc 3.3.5 and im guessing that libstdc++.so.6 is libstdc++.so
I just tried to install skype, it wont start, and in the logs it tells
me it cant find libstdc++.so.6, which doesnt surprise me because it
doesnt exist on my system.
im using gcc 3.3.5 and im guessing that libstdc++.so.6 is libstdc++.so compiled with gcc 3.4.5.
how can i solve this problem? i
15 matches
Mail list logo
