On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:22:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On my new installation, I have in my fstab:
> /dev/sda5 /home ext4
> noatime 0 1
>
> but on new installation /home doesn't mount by default, why?
What does syslog say? Is it even trying to mou
在 2021/1/17 下午4:42, Stefan Schmiedl 写道:
"the...@sys-concept.com" , 17.01.2021, 09:34:
On 1/17/21 1:22 AM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On one of my system I have in fstab:
/dev/sda4 /home ext4 noatime 0 1
and /home is mounted by default
On my new in
"the...@sys-concept.com" , 17.01.2021, 09:34:
> On 1/17/21 1:22 AM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On one of my system I have in fstab:
>> /dev/sda4 /home ext4 noatime 0 1
>> and /home is mounted by default
>>
>> On my new installation, I have in my fs
On 1/17/21 1:22 AM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On one of my system I have in fstab:
> /dev/sda4 /home ext4noatime 0 1
> and /home is mounted by default
>
> On my new installation, I have in my fstab:
> /dev/sda5 /home ext4
On one of my system I have in fstab:
/dev/sda4 /home ext4noatime 0 1
and /home is mounted by default
On my new installation, I have in my fstab:
/dev/sda5 /home ext4noatime 0 1
but on new installation /home d
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ...still fiddling with Linux on my ASUS MeMO Pad 7... ;)
>
> Current status:
> SDCard:
> Back from extFAT (too slllooww) to FAT32
> On this SDCard two file, each 4GB in sizse and formatted ext4
> One conatins currently the complete Linux (used as chro
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ...still fiddling with Linux on my ASUS MeMO Pad 7... ;)
>
> Current status:
> SDCard:
> Back from extFAT (too slllooww) to FAT32
> On this SDCard two file, each 4GB in sizse and formatted ext4
> One conatins currently the complete Linux (used as chro
Hi,
...still fiddling with Linux on my ASUS MeMO Pad 7... ;)
Current status:
SDCard:
Back from extFAT (too slllooww) to FAT32
On this SDCard two file, each 4GB in sizse and formatted ext4
One conatins currently the complete Linux (used as chroot environment)
The second one contains a copy
Am 21.05.2014 21:44, schrieb Tom H:
> The answer is "no" unless you want to apply different perms to "/dev/shm".
I don't have an idea why I should want to do that so I removed the line
for now. Thanks.
Stefan
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 20:44:04 Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> > Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> >>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
> >>> systemd/gno
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
>>> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>>>
>>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects
Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
>> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>>
>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
>> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>
> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
> # (tmpfs is a dynamically e
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
->
# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
# (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will
# use almost no memory if not
> just building a new qemu appliance and following the handbook it
> mentions the /proc an tmpfs file systems in fstab, but the stage
> template no longer has these entries - is the handbook out of date and
> openrc handles it? - or did I accidentally delete them? Do I still need
> those entries .
just building a new qemu appliance and following the handbook it
mentions the /proc an tmpfs file systems in fstab, but the stage
template no longer has these entries - is the handbook out of date and
openrc handles it? - or did I accidentally delete them? Do I still need
those entries ... that wi
I'm on the train so its hard to check the man pages but can't you use
udevtrigger or a similar tool so rebooting isn't required?
On 12/17/09, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/17/2009 08:42 PM, Denis wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> Quick question.
>>
>> My main HD is SATA and gets /dev/sda in fstab.
> The default udev scripts should have been able to automatically create
> symlinks for optical devices in /dev. Whether yours is broken, you can
> find out by trying to ls -l /dev/cdrom :)
It appears the links /dev/cdrom1 and /dev/cdrw1 are tied to /dev/hda.
Is that the default behavior instead o
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:42:33PM -0500, Penguin Lover Denis squawked:
> My main HD is SATA and gets /dev/sda in fstab. My CDROM, which is the
> only device on the IDE bus, seems to be /dev/hda. That's what
> Audacious declared when it was looking for a CD to play. I had CDROM
> device forced t
Hello folks,
Quick question.
My main HD is SATA and gets /dev/sda in fstab. My CDROM, which is the
only device on the IDE bus, seems to be /dev/hda. That's what
Audacious declared when it was looking for a CD to play. I had CDROM
device forced to /dev/cdrom in Audacious, unwittingly, before an
On 16 Aug 2007, at 03:49, Colleen Beamer wrote:
... In fstab it is /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdc2
because I've configured it to have two ext3 partitions. If the
drive is
not powered on when I boot and then, I turn it on, I have to reboot to
get fstab to recognize it.
No, you don't have to. `sudo
Colleen Beamer writes:
> I have a usb external hard drive attached to my computer. It's an
> Iomega and has a power switch. In fstab it is /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdc2
> because I've configured it to have two ext3 partitions. If the drive
> is not powered on when I boot and then, I turn it on, I hav
> Colleen Beamer wrote:
> > The wrinkle is that my son bought me a usbstick. I can mount it just
> > fine. However, if my usb external hard drive is not powered on on boot,
> > the stick is recognized at sdc1. If the usb drive is powered on then,
> > the stick is recognized as sdd1. So, this me
Colleen Beamer wrote:
Hi,
I have a situation that, before, kind of bugged me but I was able to
deal with it. However, now I've added another wrinkle to the situation.
I have a usb external hard drive attached to my computer. It's an
Iomega and has a power switch. In fstab it is /dev/sdc1 and
On (15/08/07 22:49) Colleen Beamer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a situation that, before, kind of bugged me but I was able to
> deal with it. However, now I've added another wrinkle to the situation.
>
> I have a usb external hard drive attached to my computer. It's an
> Iomega and has a power switc
Hi,
I have a situation that, before, kind of bugged me but I was able to
deal with it. However, now I've added another wrinkle to the situation.
I have a usb external hard drive attached to my computer. It's an
Iomega and has a power switch. In fstab it is /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdc2
because I've
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:36, rob wrote:
> What do the 2 zerros at the end of the line mean and why is
> the / dira1 0
Not to be pedantic, but it's '0 1' for the / partition :-)
Others have referred you to the man pages that describe these
settings, but what isn't obvious
quoth the rob:
> What do the 2 zerros at the end of the line mean and why is the
> / dira1 0
>
> rob
fs_freq and fs_passno
See man 5 fstab
Though '/' should be '0 1'. fs_freq is all but obsolete
-d
--
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"
rob wrote:
> What do the 2 zerros at the end of the line mean and why is the
> / dira1 0
>
> rob
>
>From `man fstab`:
The fifth field, (fs_freq), is used for these filesystems by the
dump(8) command to determine
which filesystems need to be dumped. If the fifth
rob wrote:
What do the 2 zerros at the end of the line mean and why is the
/ dira1 0
rob
dump and pass. The fstab man page will explain it
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
What do the 2 zerros at the end of the line mean and why is the
/ dira1 0
rob
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
hi
i have starnge problem, these two partitions sometimes isnt mounted
from fstab:
/dev/hdb4 /mnt/hdb4 ext3noatime
0 0
/dev/hdb12 /usr/portage/distfiles ext3noatime
0 0
i cant find any errors, logs shows nothing.
On 8/27/06, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, that is what I want it to do.
Originally my 1Mb stick with dos partition had 978Mb on it.
I've partitioned it to Linux partition and formated as ext2, the free
disk space went down to 913Mb
Try tune2fs -m 0 to set the reserved block percentage
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 23:44 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > It is a usb stick so it has a vfat file system. However, I've reformat
> > the stick with fdisk to ext2 filesystem. With vfat it has 978mb
> > capacity now after formating is to ext2 it has a 913mb capacity.
> > Is there a way to crea
It is a usb stick so it has a vfat file system. However, I've reformat
the stick with fdisk to ext2 filesystem. With vfat it has 978mb
capacity now after formating is to ext2 it has a 913mb capacity.
Is there a way to create dos (vfat) partition with Linux fdisk utility?
As far as i know fdisk
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 16:53 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Penguin Lover Joseph squawked:
> > Can someone refresh my memory?
> > I'm trying to mount usb memory stick with permission 600 but it is not
> > taking devmode=0600
> >
> > The current command mounts
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Penguin Lover Joseph squawked:
> Can someone refresh my memory?
> I'm trying to mount usb memory stick with permission 600 but it is not
> taking devmode=0600
>
> The current command mounts it as 755
> /dev/sda1 /mnt/camera auto
> noauto,
Can someone refresh my memory?
I'm trying to mount usb memory stick with permission 600 but it is not
taking devmode=0600
The current command mounts it as 755
/dev/sda1 /mnt/camera auto
noauto,rw,users,exec
I've tried:
/dev/sda1 /mnt/camera auto
noauto,devmode=
> you have to know the device of your cdrom
> generaly it's a secondary master ide
> /dev/hdc
> so set fstab to :
> /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,user0 0
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
On my system (I am using udev) There are two symlinks created in /dev
for my cdroms
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:52:43 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all. It's me, again.
> I have set my /etc/fstab following the instractions of the Handbook. In the
> example there is this entry:
>
> /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,user0 0
you have to know the device o
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 20:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all. It's me, again.
> I have set my /etc/fstab following the instractions of the Handbook. In the
> example there is this entry:
>
> /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,user0 0
>
> To-day I discovered that there
Hi all. It's me, again.
I have set my /etc/fstab following the instractions of the Handbook. In the
example there is this entry:
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,user0 0
To-day I discovered that there is no /cdroms subdirectory in /dev directory.
Is it a bug either of
On 2005-06-09 22:08:52 + (Thu, Jun), Martins Steinbergs wrote:
> what's wrong with these, users cant access partitions (Access denied to
> /mnt/win_j.), only root can go there.
>
> fstab
>
> /dev/hda1/mnt/win_cntfsdefaults,ro,user0 0
> /dev/hdb8/mnt/win_jv
Martins Steinbergs schreef:
> hi,
>
> what's wrong with these, users cant access partitions (Access denied to
> /mnt/win_j.), only root can go there.
>
> fstab
>
> /dev/hda1/mnt/win_cntfsdefaults,ro,user0 0
> /dev/hdb8/mnt/win_jvfatdefaults,rw,user
Martins writes:
> what's wrong with these, users cant access partitions (Access denied to
> /mnt/win_j.), only root can go there.
> /dev/hda1/mnt/win_cntfsdefaults,ro,user0 0
> /dev/hdb8/mnt/win_jvfatdefaults,rw,user0 0
Add the umask option:
/dev
Martins Steinbergs wrote:
hi,
what's wrong with these, users cant access partitions (Access denied to
/mnt/win_j.), only root can go there.
fstab
/dev/hda1/mnt/win_cntfsdefaults,ro,user0 0
/dev/hdb8/mnt/win_jvfatdefaults,rw,user0 0
Martins
Sho
hi,
what's wrong with these, users cant access partitions (Access denied to
/mnt/win_j.), only root can go there.
fstab
/dev/hda1/mnt/win_cntfsdefaults,ro,user0 0
/dev/hdb8/mnt/win_jvfatdefaults,rw,user0 0
Martins
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mail
47 matches
Mail list logo
