Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:50:18 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > > I'm not sure what the big deal is, so portasge skips emerging one > > package because it can't download the distfile. So what? The previous > > version worked OK the day before and won't suddenly break because an > > update is available. J

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:15:49 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > >> I was thinking 'skip the fetch restriction check', but if the ebuild >> doesn't have the file path to retrieve, that's almost moot. It's >> _plausible_ one could calculate the path f

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:15:49 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > I was thinking 'skip the fetch restriction check', but if the ebuild > doesn't have the file path to retrieve, that's almost moot. It's > _plausible_ one could calculate the path from the version of the > package being emerged, though, so I

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 04/30/12 14:44, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> Does the ebuild for portage support user-supplied patches? >> > > It doesn't look like it, but you can always hack it with, > >  post_src_unpack() { >      cd "${S}" >      epatch_user >  } > > i

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/30/12 14:44, Michael Mol wrote: > > Does the ebuild for portage support user-supplied patches? > It doesn't look like it, but you can always hack it with, post_src_unpack() { cd "${S}" epatch_user } in your ~/.bashrc.

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 04/30/12 14:20, james wrote: >> Hello, >> >> OK so I have java that I must use, but it is >> "fetch restricted" becasue of Oracle being >> an a_hole. >> >> However, I do not have time to manually bypass the fetch restrction >> every tim

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/30/12 14:20, james wrote: > Hello, > > OK so I have java that I must use, but it is > "fetch restricted" becasue of Oracle being > an a_hole. > > However, I do not have time to manually bypass the fetch restrction > every time the file needs to be updated, as I manage > too many different

Re: [gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:20 PM, james wrote: > Hello, > > OK so I have java that I must use, but it is > "fetch restricted" becasue of Oracle being > an a_hole. > > However, I do not have time to manually bypass the fetch restrction > every time the file needs to be updated, as I manage > too man

[gentoo-user] fetch restriction bypass

2012-04-30 Thread james
Hello, OK so I have java that I must use, but it is "fetch restricted" becasue of Oracle being an a_hole. However, I do not have time to manually bypass the fetch restrction every time the file needs to be updated, as I manage too many different gentoo systems. FU ] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.31