[The scene: Joseph is having trouble getting distcc and distccmon-gnome
to work. I asked him to test outside of emerge.]
Joseph wrote:
Yes, it did work; I run the distccmon-gnome on both computers but the
activity only showed up on the computer that initiate the compiling .101
with IP of the c
[snip]
> > distcc [COMPILER] [compile options] -o OBJECT -c SOURCE
> > So in my example if I want to test it on 10.0.0.101 machine I would
> > enter:
> > distcc 10.0.0.103:3632 -o ? -c ?
> >
> > What do I put in place of OBJECT SOURCE?
>
> Oh, being a C programmer, I don't really have a proble
Joseph wrote:
Yes, it runs but in order to test it I need to compile something, the
argument is
distcc [COMPILER] [compile options] -o OBJECT -c SOURCE
So in my example if I want to test it on 10.0.0.101 machine I would
enter:
distcc 10.0.0.103:3632 -o ? -c ?
What do I put in place of OBJECT
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 11:50 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Need more info from clients and servers:
> architectures of each machine
> gcc versions
> glibc versions
>
> add
> "DISTCCD_OPTS="${DISTCCD_OPTS} --log-level info"
> to /etc/conf.d/distccd to each machine. Then chec
Need more info from clients and servers:
architectures of each machine
gcc versions
glibc versions
add
"DISTCCD_OPTS="${DISTCCD_OPTS} --log-level info"
to /etc/conf.d/distccd to each machine. Then check the client and
server syslogs whilst compiling.
If you have a firew
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 12:33 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Joseph wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 00:05 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >>Joseph wrote:
> >>>I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
> >>>is simple but for some reason or another I don't
Joseph wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 00:05 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Joseph wrote:
I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
is simple but for some reason or another I don't see any activity with
distccmon-gnome across my network.
It's very easy to no
Try adding the port to
distcc-config --set-hosts "10.0.0.101:3632 10.0.0.103:3632"
When i tried to use it without a port did not not work.
Catalin
Joseph wrote:
>I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
>is simple but for some reason or another I don't
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 00:05 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> Joseph wrote:
> > I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
> > is simple but for some reason or another I don't see any activity with
> > distccmon-gnome across my network.
>
> It's very easy to
Joseph wrote:
I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
is simple but for some reason or another I don't see any activity with
distccmon-gnome across my network.
It's very easy to not see DISTCC processes in distccmon-gnome when using
emerge, since it uses a p
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 20:16 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> Joseph wrote:
> > I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
> > is simple but for some reason or another I don't see any activity with
> > distccmon-gnome across my network.
> >
> > make.conf:
> > MAKEOPTS="-j3
Joseph wrote:
> I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
> is simple but for some reason or another I don't see any activity with
> distccmon-gnome across my network.
>
> make.conf:
> MAKEOPTS="-j3"
> FEATURES="distcc"
>
> /etc/conf.d/distccd:
> DISTCCD_OPTS="$
I'm reading all the posts regarding distcc and it seems to me everything
is simple but for some reason or another I don't see any activity with
distccmon-gnome across my network.
make.conf:
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
FEATURES="distcc"
/etc/conf.d/distccd:
DISTCCD_OPTS="${DISTCCD_OPTS} --allow 10.0.0.103"
13 matches
Mail list logo