On Fri, Dec 20 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:34:34 -0500, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>
>> > You can generate the list with
>> >
>> > qlist -ICv | sed -e 's/^/~/' -e 's/-r[1-9]$//'
>> > >/etc/portage/package.mask/goingstable
>>
>> Am I correct in believing that there is a typo
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:34:34 -0500, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> > You can generate the list with
> >
> > qlist -ICv | sed -e 's/^/~/' -e 's/-r[1-9]$//'
> > >/etc/portage/package.mask/goingstable
>
> Am I correct in believing that there is a typo and "package.mask"
> should be "package.accept_keyw
On Wed, Oct 17 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:18:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
>> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
>> up.
>>
>> Can someone repost this msg?
>
>
On Wed, Oct 17 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:18:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
>> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
>> up.
>>
>> I believe the basic idea was to u
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:54:16 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> qlist -ICv | sed -e 's/^/~/' -e 's/-r[1-9]$//'
> >/etc/portage/package.use/goingstable
That should, of course, be package.unmask, not package.use.
--
Neil Bothwick
This chicken has no beak, said Tom impeccably.
signature.asc
Descri
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:18:50 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
> up.
>
> I believe the basic idea was to unmask a bunch of packages and then as
> stable catc
Am 17.10.2012 22:18, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
> stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
> up.
>
> I believe the basic idea was to unmask a bunch of packages and then as
> stable catches up, remove
A few months ago a procedure was given for converting from testing to
stable (e.g. ~amd64-->~amd) by essentially waiting for stable to catch
up.
I believe the basic idea was to unmask a bunch of packages and then as
stable catches up, remove the unmasks. I also believe there was some
automated wa
8 matches
Mail list logo