On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:28:26 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Nothing as clever as that. I simply
>
> echo "cat/pkg" >>/etc/portage/sets/temp
>
> and have @temp in /var/lib/portage/world_sets
>
> Each week I look at the set and decide what should be removed or
> transferred to world.
That brought
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:29:01 +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> > Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That
> > way the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output
> > until I decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft
> > from various experim
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:39:55 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That way
> the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output until I
> decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft from various
> experiments, alt
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
>>> all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but
>>> I
>>> haven't found one, and
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
>> all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I
>> haven't found one, and prefer the manual approach above.
>>
>>
Dale writes:
> I know you can use eix-test-obsolete to find outdated/unneeded thing in
> /etc/portage but I wish it would also do something similiar for the
> world file. I just wonder if the person that wrote eix and friends
> could add that in as a feature? It would be neat. eix works really
Sebastian Günther schrieb am 26.04.2009 19:55:
> * Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [26.04.09 18:49]:
>> It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
>> all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but
>> I
>> haven't found one, a
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [26.04.09 18:49]:
>
> It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
> all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I
> haven't found one, and prefer the manual approach above.
>
#!/bin/bash
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
> all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I
> haven't found one, and prefer the manual approach above.
>
>
>
I know you can use eix-test-obsolete to find o
On Sunday 26 April 2009 08:40:39 John covici wrote:
> OK, so this brings up the question, how do I make sure (if there is a
> way to do so) that my world file does not contain anything which it
> should not -- I am sure I have made the mistake of forgetting to put
> the -1, so it would be interesti
on Saturday 04/25/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
> On Saturday 25 April 2009 20:52:28 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> > On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
> > > app-text/poppler-bindings and app-text/poppler aren't needed by anything
> > > right now.
> >
> > So, I just unmerg
On Sunday 26 April 2009 05:39:52 fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:27:08PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> > And from experience, I can tell you it happens when you don't use that
> > -1 option when you should. You can end up with a HUGE world file when
> > not using that opton to just re
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:39:52 -0700, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> I am probably in that very situation. My world file is 5794 lines
> long. I didn't know about -1 and frankly don't understand it. If I
> remerge a package which is not in world, why is it added to world? I
> had seen a few vague re
090425 fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> My world file is 5794 lines long.
Well, it's true there are 13 465 pkgs in Gentoo (as of yesterday),
but I have only 538 installed & only 65 in 'world'.
Yes, I use '-1' frequently ... (grin)
--
,,
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:39:52 -0700
fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> I am probably in that very situation. My world file is 5794 lines
> long. I didn't know about -1 and frankly don't understand it. If I
> remerge a package which is not in world, why is it added to world? I
> had seen a few vague ref
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:27:08PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> And from experience, I can tell you it happens when you don't use that
> -1 option when you should. You can end up with a HUGE world file when
> not using that opton to just rebuild something for some reason or other.
I am probably in that v
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:52:28 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
>
>> I'm not sure what pulled in those newer versions previously.
>>
>
> You had both poppler and poppler-bindings in world. What you saw was one
> of the effects of a world file polluted by packages that
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:52:28 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> I'm not sure what pulled in those newer versions previously.
You had both poppler and poppler-bindings in world. What you saw was one
of the effects of a world file polluted by packages that should only ever
be installed as dependenc
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Incidentally, poppler has a long and fine history of insanely breaking users'
> configs every time its developers sneeze. The number of times I've had
> poppler
> show up in revdep-rebuild output defies any kind of sane, logical, rational
> description. Not even Microso
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:14:23 -0400
"Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
> On 26/04/09 Mike Kazantsev said:
>
> > And note that >=sys-apps/portage-2.2 will resolve that automagically
> > - without user (your) intervention.
>
> sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.7
>
> Will that go stable soon?
I've yet to see any b
On Saturday 25 April 2009 20:52:28 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
> > app-text/poppler-bindings and app-text/poppler aren't needed by anything
> > right now.
>
> So, I just unmerged them and now my upgrade path looks good.
>
> I'm not sure what pulled in those newe
On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
> app-text/poppler-bindings and app-text/poppler aren't needed by anything right
> now.
So, I just unmerged them and now my upgrade path looks good.
I'm not sure what pulled in those newer versions previously.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier
"Any intelligent fo
On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
> So, luatex and xpdf require poppler 0.10.4, but app-text/poppler-0.10.5-r1 is
> already installed. I guess xpdf and luatex can't handle the newer poppler
> version for some reason? It's actually trying to downgrade poppler and
> poppler-bindings for some reas
On 25/04/09 Justin said:
> It tells you what todo:
>
> emerge app-text/poppler-bindings-0.10.4
>
> with USE="gtk cairo"
>
> check that if it solves the problem
Ok, I rebuilt app-text/poppler-bindings with USE="gtk cairo", and I removed
app-text/poppler-bindings from world.
Now I get this
msoul.
On Saturday 25 April 2009 20:17:52 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 25/04/09 Neil Bothwick said:
> > And remove poppler-bindings from world.
>
> Ok, and will prevent it from being considered during my next world update,
> as I understand it. Can you explain why that's a good thing?
No, it just takes
On 25/04/09 Neil Bothwick said:
> And remove poppler-bindings from world.
Ok, and will prevent it from being considered during my next world update, as
I understand it. Can you explain why that's a good thing?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and
On 25/04/09 Justin said:
> It tells you what todo:
>
> emerge app-text/poppler-bindings-0.10.4
>
> with USE="gtk cairo"
>
> check that if it solves the problem
msoul...@anton:~$ USE="gtk cairo" sudo emerge --pretend
app-text/poppler-bindings
These are the packages that would be merged, in
On 26/04/09 Mike Kazantsev said:
> And note that >=sys-apps/portage-2.2 will resolve that automagically
> - without user (your) intervention.
sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.7
Will that go stable soon?
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:48:51 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> And remove poppler-bindings from world.
And note that >=sys-apps/portage-2.2 will resolve that automagically
- without user (your) intervention.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:30 +0200, Justin wrote:
> > ('ebuild', '/', 'app-text/poppler-bindings-0.10.5-r1', 'merge')
> > pulled in by app-text/poppler-bindings required by world
> >
> > Explanation:
> >
> > New USE for 'app-text/poppler-bindings:0' are incorrectly set. In
> > order
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I'm trying to understand the explanation of this but I don't quite see it. It
looks like conflicting libraries used by gimp, inkscape and openoffice.
I don't quite understand the explanation, and what my options are.
Translation appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
msoul...@
I'm trying to understand the explanation of this but I don't quite see it. It
looks like conflicting libraries used by gimp, inkscape and openoffice.
I don't quite understand the explanation, and what my options are.
Translation appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend --u
32 matches
Mail list logo
