On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:08:07 -0400, dhk wrote:
> How do I use SEARCH_DIRS_MASK, is there a doc? I didn't see anything
> under man make.conf. I don't think I want to exclude the whole
> directory, just the library: right?
If you only want to exclude a library, you need LD_LIBRARY_MASK.
The rev
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:08 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
> On 09/09/2010 04:59 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 01:18 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk
> > did
> >
> > opine thusly:
> >> Well I deleted /usr/lib32/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4
On 09/09/2010 04:59 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 01:18 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk did
> opine thusly:
>
>> Well I deleted /usr/lib32/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4.6.2 and ran
>> revdep-rebuild and got the following
>> . . .
>> * Checking dynamic linking consistency
>>
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:18 on Thursday 09 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
> Well I deleted /usr/lib32/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4.6.2 and ran
> revdep-rebuild and got the following
> . . .
> * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> [ 39% ] * broken
> /usr/lib32/qt4/plugins/graphicssy
On 09/08/2010 05:47 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:19 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
> opine thusly:
>
>> On 09/08/2010 09:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk
>>> did
>>>
>>> opine thusly
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:19 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
> On 09/08/2010 09:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk
> > did
> >
> > opine thusly:
> >> Below is the output when I run "revdep-rebui
On 09/08/2010 09:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
> opine thusly:
>
>> Below is the output when I run "revdep-rebuild --ignore". This started
>> in the spring and never cleared up. Everything on my amd64 box runs
>> fine
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:11 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, dhk did
opine thusly:
> Below is the output when I run "revdep-rebuild --ignore". This started
> in the spring and never cleared up. Everything on my amd64 box runs
> fine and nothing complains about the missing library. I r
Below is the output when I run "revdep-rebuild --ignore". This started
in the spring and never cleared up. Everything on my amd64 box runs
fine and nothing complains about the missing library. I regularly do
updates and everytime I run "revdep-rebuild --ignore" I get the same
results. How can I
9 matches
Mail list logo
