Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-18 Thread Justin
I upgraded another machine this morning and the file was untouched. Me too. But I have another problem on two machines. After the upgrade following message is drop while rebooting: * Stopping gdm ... * start-stop-daemon: fopen `/var/run/gdm.pid': No such file or directory [ ok ] What

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:10:59 +0100, Graham Murray wrote: > > If you use dispatch-conf, check /etc/config-archive for your previous > > version. You might get lucky... That won't help because the replacement is done by the ebuild. > It was not there for me. conf.d/net.example was in there but

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-18 Thread Graham Murray
Roy Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you use dispatch-conf, check /etc/config-archive for your previous > version. You might get lucky... It was not there for me. conf.d/net.example was in there but not conf.d/net which contained the pre-baselayout-2 network configuration. My main complai

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-18 Thread Roy Wright
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 17 April 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >>> Because you didn't read the elog messages. >> it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly >> stupid. > > This one caught me too, and I DID read the elog message plus the upgrade > guide. /etc/conf

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Because you didn't read the elog messages. > > it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly > stupid. This one caught me too, and I DID read the elog message plus the upgrade guide. /etc/conf.d/net is not mentioned anywh

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > > fsck runs with the -p optio

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > > -p option >

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > > -p option >

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > -p option > > Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes. > > Bye... > > Dirk no, the

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Because you didn't read the elog messages. > > it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid. It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I upgraded. /etc/init.d/net.eth0 was removed

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > -p option Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes. Bye... Dirk signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtente

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > > unpleasant surprises. > > Because you didn't read the elog messages. it is still not ok to remove /etc/

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread forgottenwizard
On 16:03 Thu 17 Apr , Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > unpleasant surprises. > Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? > > Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently) > > /etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now /etc

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Andrés Becerra Sandoval
On 4/17/08, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > unpleasant surprises. > Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? > > Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently) > > /etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > unpleasant surprises. Because you didn't read the elog messages. > Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? Yes, and emerge tells you to read it: You should now

[gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some unpleasant surprises. Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently) /etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now /etc/rc.conf ?) /etc/conf.d/net seems to have gone this inhibited my