On Wednesday 22 April 2015 09:54:01 I wrote:
> Are you telling me what my system does or doesn't need?
Sorry - I seem to be a bit prickly this morning. Where's that coffee?
--
Rgds
Peter
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 04:10:24 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 12:19:03 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 April 2015 12:38:40 Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > Am 21.04.2015 um 03:14 schrieb Joseph:
> > > > I don't think grub is asking for it.
> > >
> > > I know it does
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 12:19:03 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2015 12:38:40 Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am 21.04.2015 um 03:14 schrieb Joseph:
> > > I don't think grub is asking for it.
> >
> > I know it does, because grub-0.97 is 32 bit only software, and the
> > package sys-boot/
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 21.04.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>>>
Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
>>>
>>> Why? As long as grub legacy is working
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 21.04.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>>>
Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
>>>
>>> Why? As long as grub legacy is working
Am 21.04.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>>
>>> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
>>
>> Why? As long as grub legacy is working there's no need to upgrade. I'm
>> still running grub legacy
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>
>> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
>
> Why? As long as grub legacy is working there's no need to upgrade. I'm
> still running grub legacy, too.
>
In this context, because you can build it w
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 12:38:40 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 21.04.2015 um 03:14 schrieb Joseph:
> > I don't think grub is asking for it.
>
> I know it does, because grub-0.97 is 32 bit only software, and the
> package sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14 compiles grub from the sources with
> dynamic linking. So i
Am 21.04.2015 um 03:30 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> I was looking to my world update and I saw that none of my emul-linux
> packages will be removed and there are some packages which depend on
> them such as nvidia-drivers and the C compiler! So any reason to do
> anything, or just let portag
Am 21.04.2015 um 03:14 schrieb Joseph:
> I don't think grub is asking for it.
I know it does, because grub-0.97 is 32 bit only software, and the
package sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14 compiles grub from the sources with
dynamic linking. So it needs 32 bit dependencies (packages with
USE="abi_x86_32") inc
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:36:52 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote:
> > Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
> >
>
> I only use grub2 on machines with EFI, and in my house that's only
> two...
>
> I can't stand how it tries to add things automatically. It actually got
> so annoying that I created a manu
Joseph wrote:
> On 04/21/15 00:47, Heiko Baums wrote:
> >Am 21.04.2015 um 00:22 schrieb Joseph:
> >> I'm trying to update one of my amd64 (I use XFCE) and there are lot of
> >> package that require use flag: abi_x86_32
> >>
> >> Which package is forcing new: abi_x86_32 flag?
> >
> >sys-boot/grub-
On 04/20/2015 06:14 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I don't think grub is asking for it.
Not grub specifically, but grub is probably built with ncurses support
and ncurses needs it.
Dan
On 04/20/2015 04:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
>
I only use grub2 on machines with EFI, and in my house that's only two...
I can't stand how it tries to add things automatically. It actually got
so annoying that I created a manual boot entry that is symlinke
On 04/21/15 00:47, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am 21.04.2015 um 00:22 schrieb Joseph:
I'm trying to update one of my amd64 (I use XFCE) and there are lot of
package that require use flag: abi_x86_32
Which package is forcing new: abi_x86_32 flag?
sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
Repla
Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already.
Why? As long as grub legacy is working there's no need to upgrade. I'm
still running grub legacy, too.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 21.04.2015 um 00:22 schrieb Joseph:
>> I'm trying to update one of my amd64 (I use XFCE) and there are lot of
>> package that require use flag: abi_x86_32
>>
>> Which package is forcing new: abi_x86_32 flag?
>
> sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14
> x11-
Am 21.04.2015 um 00:22 schrieb Joseph:
> I'm trying to update one of my amd64 (I use XFCE) and there are lot of
> package that require use flag: abi_x86_32
>
> Which package is forcing new: abi_x86_32 flag?
sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
Replace sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14 by sys-b
I'm trying to update one of my amd64 (I use XFCE) and there are lot of package
that require use flag: abi_x86_32
equery d emul-linux
(nothing found)
for EMUL in $(eix -I --only-names emul-linux); do equery depends $EMUL; done
* These packages depend on app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs:
app
19 matches
Mail list logo
