On 29/07/14 14:50, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 29/07/2014 13:45, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>> Thanks every one.
>>
>> I guess I got it know !
>> And I must say that the way Gentoo is working now, is simple, no doubts.
>>
>> And I am surprised to hear that Gentoo is so strict to follow upstream.
>> I g
On Wed, 30 July 2014, at 3:42 pm, James wrote:
>
>> Gentoo … I really like it !
>
> Are you kidding? Really? ... you just do not realize just how rediculous
> this line of reasoning/questioning is?
I think you must have misunderstood.
Stroller.
> However, the project have somehow become quiet, probably as the
> bandwidth and data volumes are no longer such an issue.
thanks for your help, however bandwidth is always an issue for me and
it seems that always will be! unfortunately I am living in Iran,
which means low speed and high price!
There used to be this tool, deltup, that was providing binary patches
given what versions you have already downloaded and what you are trying
to download, which sounds like something that would answer your question.
However, the project have somehow become quiet, probably as the
bandwidth and data
On 29/07/2014 13:45, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> Thanks every one.
>
> I guess I got it know !
> And I must say that the way Gentoo is working now, is simple, no doubts.
>
> And I am surprised to hear that Gentoo is so strict to follow upstream.
> I guess it makes it the most vanilla flavored, And
Thanks every one.
I guess I got it know !
And I must say that the way Gentoo is working now, is simple, no doubts.
And I am surprised to hear that Gentoo is so strict to follow upstream.
I guess it makes it the most vanilla flavored, And I really like it !
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:25:09 +0100, thegeezer wrote:
> to save yourself the downloads you might want to look into setting up
> your own PORTAGE_BINHOST that you can redistribute from, but be wary
> that different devices may require different compile options, so you can
> sacrifice speed for compa
On 29/07/2014 12:52, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> well chromium was just an example. I just think that when there is a
> version upgrade, a patch should be enough.
> I have read that portage is migrating to git, but I guess I got it
> wrong, because I thought that the source codes will be maintained u
On 29/07/14 12:00, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, behrouz khosravi
> wrote:
>> well chromium was just an example. I just think that when there is a version
>> upgrade, a patch should be enough.
> For things like backports you're fairly likely to only get a patch.
> However
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> well chromium was just an example. I just think that when there is a version
> upgrade, a patch should be enough.
For things like backports you're fairly likely to only get a patch.
However, for an upstream version change (which chromium
well chromium was just an example. I just think that when there is a
version upgrade, a patch should be enough.
I have read that portage is migrating to git, but I guess I got it wrong,
because I thought that the source codes will be maintained using git too.
However why not? why not use git for so
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:38:04 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> I was trying to emerge chromium and I noticed that it should download
> about 200 Mb, and no wonder cause it is source files, not binary
> executable. However I wanted to know that if a new version of chromium
> comes out, an update wil
hello everyone.
I was trying to emerge chromium and I noticed that it should download about
200 Mb, and no wonder cause it is source files, not binary executable.
However I wanted to know that if a new version of chromium comes out, an
update will download another 200 Mb or just a diff files to pat
13 matches
Mail list logo
