> What do you guys do when you want to try the masked version of a
> package to fix a problem you're having with the stable version, but
> you don't want to follow the ~x86 version indefinitely? I've just
> been adding the package to package.keywords, but that obviously
> follows the masked versi
On 7/18/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you guys do when you want to try the masked version of a
package to fix a problem you're having with the stable version, but
you don't want to follow the ~x86 version indefinitely? I've just
been adding the package to package.keywords, but tha
At Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:00:48 -0700 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you guys do when you want to try the masked version of a
> package to fix a problem you're having with the stable version, but
> you don't want to follow the ~x86 version indefinitely? I've just
> been adding the packag
What do you guys do when you want to try the masked version of a
package to fix a problem you're having with the stable version, but
you don't want to follow the ~x86 version indefinitely? I've just
been adding the package to package.keywords, but that obviously
follows the masked version until y
4 matches
Mail list logo
