On Wednesday 19 March 2008, 16:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:20:16 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Flash would be nice now. For some people it does work fine, but for
> > others this still is not the case it seems. Using firefox-bin or
> > wine might be workarounds, but I would
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:20:16 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Flash would be nice now. For some people it does work fine, but for
> others this still is not the case it seems. Using firefox-bin or wine
> might be workarounds, but I would not like that much - I like to use
> konqueror.
Most flash wor
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:20:39 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Next thing I would never have thought of: the root file system was too
> > small. I made it 500 MB bis, as /usr, /var, /opt, /tmp and /home are on
> > LVM. A little small because of /root/.ccache, but I usually sy
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:20:39 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
>
>
>> Next thing I would never have thought of: the root file system was too
>> small. I made it 500 MB bis, as /usr, /var, /opt, /tmp and /home are on
>> LVM. A little small because of /root/.ccache, but I usuall
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:20:39 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Next thing I would never have thought of: the root file system was too
> small. I made it 500 MB bis, as /usr, /var, /opt, /tmp and /home are on
> LVM. A little small because of /root/.ccache, but I usually symlink
> that to somewhere el
Alex Schuster wrote:
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
compromises (admittedly some minor)
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
> it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
> compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I s
> I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
> compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I should see some speed
> increase but probably only in certain areas such as compiling.
>
I just switched
Jan Seeger schreef:
Yeah, it seems nspluginwrapper works better now. The time I tried it, it just
crashed with a
segfault and did nothing. But installing it again, it seems to work. Thanks for
your suggestion^^
I have used it before but because of some strange crashes. After that
I've never
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
> Yeah, it seems nspluginwrapper works better now. The time I tried it, it
> just crashed with a segfault and did nothing. But installing it again, it
> seems to work. Thanks for your suggestion^^ --
> thenybble.de/blog/ -- four bits at a time
I on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
> On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
> > On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
> >
> >
> > > not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' fir
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
> On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
>
>
> > not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' firefox just
> > fine.
>
> Come again? I would be very glad to finally ditch the binary firefox, but
> using nspluginwrap
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 3:03 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
> not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' firefox just fine.
Come again? I would be very glad to finally ditch the binary firefox, but using
nspluginwrapper
didn't work.
On Feb 6, 2008 3:03 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > [1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/
> >
> > By the way, *right now* I'm us
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > [1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/
>
> By the way, *right now* I'm using Firefox in 64 bits, because YouTube
> now works with swfdec.
emm, 'normal' flash
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
> it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trouble with multilib
which trouble?
> , chroot'ing,
never needed.
> firefox
Anthony E. Caudel schreef:
I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I should
On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> [1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/
By the way, *right now* I'm using Firefox in 64 bits, because YouTube
now works with swfdec.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
On Feb 6, 2008 1:28 AM, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So, for those users who have used both, is it worth it overall?
I've been using amd64 two years now, and the only 32 bit applications
that *I* use are firefox-bin and mplayer-bin. With swfdec[1] getting
better and better,
I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I should see some speed
increase but
21 matches
Mail list logo
