Re: [gentoo-user] To be updated or not to be updated, Second Part

2013-09-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 08:12:51 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Calculating dependencies... done! > > Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB > > Nothing to merge; quitting. > > -- > > beagleboneblack:/root>eix x11-libs/fox > [D] x11-libs/fox > Available versions: > (1.6)

Re: [gentoo-user] To be updated or not to be updated, Second Part

2013-09-14 Thread AR (aka AleiPhoenix)
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:12 PM, wrote: > > beagleboneblack:/root>eix x11-libs/fox > [D] x11-libs/fox > Available versions: > (1.6) *1.6.40 *1.6.45 ~*1.6.49 > (1.7) ~*1.7.40 ~*1.7.41 >{(+)bzip2 debug doc (+)jpeg (+)opengl (+)png profile tiff > (+)truetype (+)zlib} >

[gentoo-user] To be updated or not to be updated, Second Part

2013-09-13 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, after updateing I got this as result: * Copying old database to /var/cache/eix/previous.eix * Running eix-update Reading Portage settings .. Building database (/var/cache/eix/portage.eix) .. [0] "gentoo" /usr/portage/ (cache: metadata-md5-or-flat) Reading category 159|159 (100%) Finishe