Re: [gentoo-user] Strange 'uname -r' output

2009-01-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:47:44 -0800, Grant wrote: > > Do you have anything set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION or a localversion* > > file in /usr/src/linux? > > Sure enough I had '2.6.11-hardened-r1' set for CONFIG_LOCALVERSION for > some reason. It's blank now. Did you write this OS or what? I just

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange 'uname -r' output

2009-01-21 Thread Grant
>> # uname -r >> 2.6.25-hardened-r132.6.11-hardened-r1 >> >> I should be booted into 2.6.25-hardened-r13. > > Do you have anything set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION or a localversion* file > in /usr/src/linux? Sure enough I had '2.6.11-hardened-r1' set for CONFIG_LOCALVERSION for some reason. It's blank

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange 'uname -r' output

2009-01-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:39:07 -0800, Grant wrote: > # uname -r > 2.6.25-hardened-r132.6.11-hardened-r1 > > I should be booted into 2.6.25-hardened-r13. Do you have anything set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION or a localversion* file in /usr/src/linux? -- Neil Bothwick Q: How many builders does it take

[gentoo-user] Strange 'uname -r' output

2009-01-21 Thread Grant
Does anyone know why I get strange output like this: # uname -r 2.6.25-hardened-r132.6.11-hardened-r1 I should be booted into 2.6.25-hardened-r13. - Grant