Re: [gentoo-user] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

2014-04-08 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:30:00AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote > I don't think you should really expect anything, it's just that we > have no intrested in breaking peoples networking... Personally I'm > worried about users with alternative /bin/sh symlinks, pointing > to something else than bash

Re: [gentoo-user] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

2014-04-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 08/04/14 04:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 04/07/2014 04:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you >> know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like >> regression from 0.1, speak up now. >> >> See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

2014-04-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/07/2014 04:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you > know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like > regression from 0.1, speak up now. > > See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 > > (I'm purposely special casing this package over oth

[gentoo-user] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

2014-04-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like regression from 0.1, speak up now. See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 (I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.) - Samuli