On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 09:05:08 +0100
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 31 May 2019 14:59:59 BST Jack wrote:
>
> > It's perfectly OK for there to still be stuff under /lib /usr/lib
> > /usr/local/lib. These are supposed to be things which are arch
> > independent, such as config stuff and scripts
On Friday, 31 May 2019 14:59:59 BST Jack wrote:
> It's perfectly OK for there to still be stuff under /lib /usr/lib
> /usr/local/lib. These are supposed to be things which are arch
> independent, such as config stuff and scripts. However, I'm pretty sure
> none of them should still be a symlink.
On 5/31/19 9:13 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2019 16:32:01 BST »Q« wrote:
The 17.1 profiles are soon to be marked stable, so I went ahead and
migrated a little over a week ago, following the draft news item Michał
Górny recently posted to -dev. FWIW, the migration seemed to go
On Thursday, 30 May 2019 16:32:01 BST »Q« wrote:
> The 17.1 profiles are soon to be marked stable, so I went ahead and
> migrated a little over a week ago, following the draft news item Michał
> Górny recently posted to -dev. FWIW, the migration seemed to go
> smoothly and I haven't noticed anyth
On Thu, 30 May 2019 15:38:34 +0100
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 May 2019 02:18:01 BST Dale wrote:
>
> > I haven't tested the 17.1 profile yet. If you are unsure, I'd just
> > use 17.0 and wait until 17.1 is released.
>
> The 17.1 profile does away with separate /lib directories as
> explai
5 matches
Mail list logo
