[gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

2009-09-22 Thread Torsten Veller
* kashani : > When building bugzilla-3.4.1-r1 which requires ~x86 I have to > unmask a number of perl modules. Two of those modules, listed above, > attempt to pull in perl-5.10.1 which isn't in portage. Hardmasking > packages that require dependencies that don't exist makes sense. If > you'd

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

2009-09-22 Thread kashani
Torsten Veller wrote: * kashani : 3. Doctored up portage.mask to mask the errant virtuals =virtual/perl-Digest-SHA-5.47 =virtual/perl-Test-Harness-3.17 Thought grumpy thoughts at developers who let packages into ~x86 with completely broken deps. Hard mask that crap next time. There are no br

[gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

2009-09-19 Thread Torsten Veller
* kashani : > 3. Doctored up portage.mask to mask the errant virtuals > >=virtual/perl-Digest-SHA-5.47 > >=virtual/perl-Test-Harness-3.17 > > Thought grumpy thoughts at developers who let packages into ~x86 > with completely broken deps. Hard mask that crap next time. There are no broken deps and

[gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

2009-09-19 Thread Torsten Veller
* Michael Higgins : > Please report the error on b.g.o., so the perl herd (or whoever is > really doing the work now) can fix the problem. Also, #gentoo-perl is > the only place to get any real help on these gentoo-perl issues... > (devolution to IRC "chat" being yet another systemic failure, IMO,