On Tue, Apr 03 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:13:43 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> Yes indeed I have it masked for exactly that reason. I will be going to
>> a combined / + /usr when the semester ends. I use this machine for my
>> lectures and assignments so prefer to bre
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:59:22 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Yes. What has happened is that the ID data has been moved out of
> > pciutils and usbutils, so hwids blocks the older versions. If you
> > want to stick with the older udev, you need the older pciutils and
> > this means you need
Am 03.04.2012 09:53, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> Yes. What has happened is that the ID data has been moved out of
> pciutils and usbutils, so hwids blocks the older versions. If you
> want to stick with the older udev, you need the older pciutils and
> this means you need a matching version of usbuti
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:13:43 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Yes indeed I have it masked for exactly that reason. I will be going to
> a combined / + /usr when the semester ends. I use this machine for my
> lectures and assignments so prefer to break it from late may through
> august.
>
> I just
On Mon, Apr 02 2012, walt wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 07:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> A normal update world turned up the error below
>> (~amd64, gnome profile)
>>
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
>> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot c
On 04/02/2012 07:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> A normal update world turned up the error below
> (~amd64, gnome profile)
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> sys-apps/pciutils:0
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
