On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 08:29 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 15:26 +, James wrote:
> > Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> >
> >
> > > I have recently added a WD 2TB green drive to two systems and am finding
> > > terrible performance with btrfs on an LVM using these d
Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> > How is btrfs , from the "driver's seat"?
> I have had one instance of a more serious corruption caused by
> some bug in btrfs that needed the latest btrfsck from git to fix
> offline - later kernels do not suffer from this apparently.
Interesting...
On 03/15/2011 04:26:44 PM, James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
>
> H, I've been contemplating btrfs on some new installs
> with the eventual goal of a CEPH network file system, on top
> of ext4 and/or btrfs. Is this issue just with the drivers, or
> related to btrfs too?
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 15:26 +, James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
>
> > I have recently added a WD 2TB green drive to two systems and am finding
> > terrible performance with btrfs on an LVM using these drives.
>
> H, I've been contemplating btrfs on some new installs
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 15:26:44 James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> > I have recently added a WD 2TB green drive to two systems and am finding
> > terrible performance with btrfs on an LVM using these drives.
>
> H, I've been contemplating btrfs on some new installs
> with
Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> I have recently added a WD 2TB green drive to two systems and am finding
> terrible performance with btrfs on an LVM using these drives.
H, I've been contemplating btrfs on some new installs
with the eventual goal of a CEPH network file system, on top
6 matches
Mail list logo
