On 02/22/2015 03:26 AM, lee wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras writes:
>
>> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
>> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to
>> the rest of the world, please :-P
>
> Why should "low" mean "high"? The rest of the
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to
> the rest of the world, please :-P
Why should "low" mean "high"? The rest of the world usually considers
"high" as high and "l
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to the
> rest of the world, please :-P
That "someone" could be you. Send mail to
gentoo-portage-...@
On 13/02/15 20:52, James wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system.
"repos.conf system" is very cool; thanks for posting about it;
but it's brand new to me [...]
Does this system effect "epatch user", as in where the patches
are pl
On 13/02/15 22:16, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:29:07 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system. I now have a
file /etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf:
[Local]
location = /usr/local/portage
auto-sync = no
And removed
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
> I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system.
"repos.conf system" is very cool; thanks for posting about it;
but it's brand new to me, so I cannot really give you advise. I
did find this, in case you had not seen it yet:
http://wiki.gentoo.or
6 matches
Mail list logo
