Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-12 Thread Dale
Hartmut Figge wrote: Dale: Hartmut Figge wrote: Perhaps i should have mentioned, in case someone is wondering what has happened, it was most likely this: - build-log.txt - [...] pulling from http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ [...] getting widget/gtk2/nsSound.cpp [...]

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-12 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Perhaps i should have mentioned, in case someone is wondering what has >> happened, it was most likely this: >> >> - build-log.txt - >> [...] >> pulling from http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ >> [...] >> getting widget/gtk2/nsSound.cpp >> [...] >> --

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-12 Thread Dale
Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: Hartmut Figge: I may take it upstream to mozilla.org. No need for that. I just heard the notification sound with the new build of SM. :) Perhaps i should have mentioned, in case someone is wondering what has happened, it was most likely this: - build-l

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-12 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: >Hartmut Figge: >>I may take it upstream to mozilla.org. > >No need for that. I just heard the notification sound with the new build >of SM. :) Perhaps i should have mentioned, in case someone is wondering what has happened, it was most likely this: - build-log.txt - [...]

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-11 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: >I may take it upstream to mozilla.org. No need for that. I just heard the notification sound with the new build of SM. :) Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Von Usern fuer User :-)

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: >Now, installation of esound was necessary for my SeaMonkey to be able to >notify of new mail with a custom sound file. I do *not* want pulseaudio, >so, do you know of an replacement for esound which could work with >SeaMonkey? Summary of the thread: Without esound there is an un

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Now, removing esound is no longer a problem for gentoo-user. I may take >> it upstream to mozilla.org. > >When you take it upstream, tell them it doesn't work in Fluxbox plus the >GUI you are using. It may help them narrow down the problem. *If*, not *when*. ;) H

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Dale
Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: Now, installation of esound was necessary for my SeaMonkey to be able to notify of new mail with a custom sound file. I do *not* want pulseaudio, so, do you know of an replacement for esound which could work with SeaMonkey? Summary of the thread: Without e

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread walt
On 01/09/2012 04:46 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > It would be interesting to know, if Gnome is using pulseaudio... Unfortunately yes. They seem determined to shove pulse down our throats just like everyone else, and for no good reason that I can see. Yes, maybe some people need a sound daemon but I

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >The difference is: gst-plugins-alsa and alsamixergui. None of them makes a difference. Sigh. >I just wonder if alsamixer has something muted? Have you ran >alsamixer to check it? Yes. All fine. Remember, that the notification works with esound. And a muted channel would not cause an un

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: 'and such' also works here. *g* alsa is enabled in the kernel and i have these packages installed: hafi@i5_64 ~ $ eix -I --only-names alsa media-libs/alsa-lib media-sound/alsa-headers media-sound/alsa-utils media-sound/alsaplayer May it be that you have other

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Dale
Hartmut Figge wrote: 'and such' also works here. *g* alsa is enabled in the kernel and i have these packages installed: hafi@i5_64 ~ $ eix -I --only-names alsa media-libs/alsa-lib media-sound/alsa-headers media-sound/alsa-utils media-sound/alsaplayer May it be that you have other packages rega

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >Maybe you should enable the alsa USE flag? alsa has been in make.conf ever. As for SM, i am not using an ebuild, but here is an excerpt from the building of SM: - build-log.txt - checking for alsa... yes checking MOZ_ALSA_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/alsa checking MOZ_ALSA_LIBS... -la

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >I would try alsa. It works fine here. Also here. >I can play music and still hear all the other sounds that come along, Also here. >such as getting emails That's the only one which doesn't work. >and such. 'and such' also works here. *g* alsa is enabled in the kernel and i have the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Dale
Hartmut Figge wrote: Dale: I have Fluxbox installed here too. I logged out of KDE and into Fluxbox. Seamonkey does NOT play the sound when in Fluxbox. :) It appears that KDE takes care of that when I am logged into it. So, you may need to figure out how to make the GUI take care of yours.

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >I have Fluxbox installed here too. I logged out of KDE and into >Fluxbox. Seamonkey does NOT play the sound when in Fluxbox. :) >It appears that KDE takes care of that when I am logged into it. So, >you may need to figure out how to make the GUI take care of yours. I seem to recall fr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Dale
Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: Neil Bothwick: That looks like a configuration option. No, it isn't. I am now using the official SM 2.6.1 from mozilla.org. Same exception. Also in a new profile. And i don't like the ugly new emoticons. *g* Hartmut I have Fluxbox installed here too. I

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: > Neil Bothwick: >>That looks like a configuration option. > > No, it isn't. I am now using the official SM 2.6.1 from mozilla.org. Same exception. Also in a new profile. And i don't like the ugly new emoticons. *g* Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Von U

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Neil Bothwick: >On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:46:45 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> I have now verified this. Without esound i am getting >> >> Timestamp: 09.01.2012 07:18:12 >> Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure >> code: 0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE) [nsISound.pla

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:46:45 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: > I have now verified this. Without esound i am getting > > Timestamp: 09.01.2012 07:18:12 > Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure > code: 0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE) [nsISound.play]" nsresult: > "0x8

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-08 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: >Now, installation of esound was necessary for my SeaMonkey to be able to >notify of new mail with a custom sound file. I have now verified this. Without esound i am getting Timestamp: 09.01.2012 07:18:12 Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-08 Thread Hartmut Figge
Michael Mol: >On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Now, installation of esound was necessary for my SeaMonkey to be able to >> notify of new mail with a custom sound file. I do *not* want pulseaudio, >> so, do you know of an replacement for esound which could work with >> SeaMo

[gentoo-user] Re: removal of esound

2012-01-08 Thread Hartmut Figge
Dale: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Now, installation of esound was necessary for my SeaMonkey to be able to >> notify of new mail with a custom sound file. I do *not* want pulseaudio, >> so, do you know of an replacement for esound which could work with >> SeaMonkey? > >I don't have esound enabled on