On 08/03/16 03:50, Francisco Ares wrote:
> Even the new USE flags, qt4 and qt5 are still not completely capable to
> switch to the desired Qt version prior to building, as, for instance,
> "dev-util/cmake" and "app-doc/doxygen", I had to manually switch
> "qtchooser" set up back to Qt4 before corre
Michael Vetter uni-konstanz.de> writes:
> > Jauhien knows what he is doing. If he is waiting on the QT5 bug to
> > be resolved, then that is where it is sitting. Surely you should open
> > up a bgo ticket on QTcreator?
> Anybody could tell me what's going on and answer my initial questions?
Bu
> Jauhien knows what he is doing. If he is waiting on the QT5 bug to
> be resolved, then that is where it is sitting. Surely you should open
> up a bgo ticket on QTcreator?
I am not sure there is any bug.
I thought it's only about configuration. My main reason for writing the
initial mail was to g
Michael Vetter uni-konstanz.de> writes:
> Recently I started developing on LXQT. As they are using Qt5 on their
> developing version I added Qt overlay and unmasked Qt5.
>From BGO-525410, the last entry:
" Jauhien Piatlicki gentoo-dev 2014-11-08 17:58:49 UTC
Moved to the tree. Will stay masked
Michael Vetter uni-konstanz.de> writes:
> Recently I started developing on LXQT. As they are using Qt5 on their
> developing version I added Qt overlay and unmasked Qt5.
BGO 525410 has some gentoo specific comments on lxqt-0.8.0 (qt5).
I'm using slim as DM and openbox as WM right now.
I got
5 matches
Mail list logo
