Re: [gentoo-user] Re: module-init-tools : masked opponent : SOLVED

2013-03-11 Thread Philip Webb
130309 Philip Webb wrote: > 130309 »Q« wrote: >> 130309 Philip Webb wrote: >>> Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg >>> telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked >>> & to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it. >>> When I did so (both), Nvidia

[gentoo-user] Re: module-init-tools : masked opponent

2013-03-09 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:02:02 -0600 »Q« wrote: > On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:22:23 -0500 > Philip Webb wrote: > > > It looks as if the change needs a 'news' msg. > > If it turns out to be solved by the tools flag for kmod, I gotta > disagree. I also use -* , but I don't think we should get news items

[gentoo-user] Re: module-init-tools : masked opponent

2013-03-09 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:22:23 -0500 Philip Webb wrote: > It looks as if the change needs a 'news' msg. If it turns out to be solved by the tools flag for kmod, I gotta disagree. I also use -* , but I don't think we should get news items whenever that's going to break something for us; we've effe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: module-init-tools : masked opponent

2013-03-09 Thread Philip Webb
130309 »Q« wrote: > 130309 Philip Webb wrote: >> Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg >> telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked >> & to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it. >> When I did so (both), Nvidia wouldn't start, even after remerg

[gentoo-user] Re: module-init-tools : masked opponent

2013-03-09 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:07:45 -0500 Philip Webb wrote: > Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg > telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked > & to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it. > When I did so (both), Nvidia wouldn't start, even after re