On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 17:29 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Neil Bothwick writes:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > > The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
> > > > from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
> > > from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
> > > boxen, that take two days to complete the emerge! I am tempt
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
> > from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
> > boxen, that take two days to complete the emerge! I am tempted to
> > start cross-compilin
sorry to hijack the thread even further...
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 23:04 +, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > > Ahem. 'scuse me:
> > > >
> > >
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Ahem. 'scuse me:
> > >
> > > I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
> > > Wanna guess why?
> >
> > well, this is Gentoo, so "compile X" where X
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Ahem. 'scuse me:
> >
> > I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
> > Wanna guess why?
>
> well, this is Gentoo, so "compile X" where X= package> probably still fits :) Openoffice for example?
spot
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
> > --
> > Iain Buchanan
> >
> > i have 4gb for /tmp
> > What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
> > yes
>
> Ahem.
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
> --
> Iain Buchanan
>
> i have 4gb for /tmp
> What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
> yes
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
Wanna guess why?
--
Alan McKinnon
al
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan
i have 4gb for /tmp
What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
yes
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, James wrote:
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > > One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never
> > > drops below 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands
> > > out. I did notice that 'X' is at the top of the list, even when
> > > the ma
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, James wrote:
> James R. Campbell reliant-data.com> writes:
> > What processes have the most on cpu time as reported by a 'ps ax' ?
>
> not certain what your are asking. Here is the result of ps ax:
He probably meant 'ps axu'
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at g
James R. Campbell reliant-data.com> writes:
> What processes have the most on cpu time as reported by a 'ps ax' ?
not certain what your are asking. Here is the result of ps ax:
# ps ax
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ?Ss 0:00 init [3]
2 ?S< 0:00 [kthreadd]
Henry Gebhardt googlemail.com> writes:
> Any ideas?
> No.But do you also see this without X running,
Yep, same load with X killed off
without most daemons running,
Yep
in single user mode...?
I did not try this. what's the option to boot into single user mode?
What would it prove?
> Any ideas?
No.But do you also see this without X running, without most daemons running,
in single user mode...?
Miguel Peña Gomez linuxhelp.cl> writes:
> atop 3
> filter by "p"
ATOP - galiot 2008/02/12 14:49:183 seconds elapsed
PRC | sys 0.01s | user 0.09s | #proc130 | #zombie0 | #exit ? |
CPU | sys 1% | user 3% | irq 0% | idle197% | wai
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never drops
> > below 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands out. I did
> > notice that 'X' is at the top of the list, even when the machine is
> > quiescent (nobody doing anything). Suspic
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 443-653-1569 wrote:
>> On 23:27 Mon 11 Feb , Miguel Peña Gomez wrote:
>>
>>> atop 3
>>>
>>> filter by "p"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> WOW!!, this atop program is great, one of the best diagnostic tools I've
>> seen. Why haven't I heard more about it?
>>
>> Bill
17 matches
Mail list logo
