James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> > 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you
> > might want is 32 bits
> > 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something
> > else and move on.
> > You must pick one of those two. There is no magic hidden solut
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > I still want to ensure I have no 32 bit packages on this system.
> Why? What is special about 32 bit libraries? They are dependencies like
> any other, if a package needs them why try to stop portage installing
> them?
Experimentation. I trying to only
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you
> might want is 32 bits
> 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something
> else and move on.
> You must pick one of those two. There is no magic hidden solution that
3 matches
Mail list logo