Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kdrive use flag quandary

2010-05-16 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:55 -0700, walt wrote: > On 05/16/2010 06:26 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > -t doesnt work in this case as emerge wants xorg-server built with the > > kdrive flag before it will continue processing - which makes sense. > > AFAICT, the cost of enabling kdrive is trivial. It

[gentoo-user] Re: kdrive use flag quandary

2010-05-16 Thread walt
On 05/16/2010 06:26 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: -t doesnt work in this case as emerge wants xorg-server built with the kdrive flag before it will continue processing - which makes sense. AFAICT, the cost of enabling kdrive is trivial. It compiles one more "server" /usr/bin/Xephyr, so I'd say jus

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kdrive use flag quandary

2010-05-16 Thread Bill Kenworthy
-t doesnt work in this case as emerge wants xorg-server built with the kdrive flag before it will continue processing - which makes sense. BillK On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 15:55 -0700, walt wrote: > On 05/15/2010 09:42 PM, William Kenworthy wrote: > > I am trying to update a laptop after a break of a

[gentoo-user] Re: kdrive use flag quandary

2010-05-16 Thread walt
On 05/15/2010 09:42 PM, William Kenworthy wrote: I am trying to update a laptop after a break of a few months and have an ... anomaly! It suddenly wants the kdrive use flag enabled for xorg-server and sabayon - why? I think kdrive is a minimal xserver built on top of xorg so its not appropriate

[gentoo-user] Re: kdrive use flag quandary

2010-05-16 Thread walt
On 05/16/2010 04:14 AM, William Kenworthy wrote: On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 13:03 +0200, ich bins wrote: Am 16.05.2010 12:22, schrieb William Kenworthy: On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 08:08 +0100, Mick wrote: On Sunday 16 May 2010 05:42:13 William Kenworthy wrote: I am trying to update a laptop after a bre