On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:26:22 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> > As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum
> > portability, FAT is the best choice. If you want to cram as much as
> > possible on the device, either use ReiserFS or get a larger device.
>
> I just did a quick experime
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 19:01 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > What is the result (disk space) in comparison to vfat, ext2 etc.?
>
> As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum
> portability, FAT is the best choice. If you want to cram as much as
> possible on the device, either
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:50:09 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> > > lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-)
> >
> > That's why I asked if it counted ;-)
>
> What is the result (disk space) in comparison to vfat, ext2 etc.?
As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum
portability, FAT is the
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 09:51 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:38:22 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>
> > > I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
> >
> > lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-)
>
> That's why I asked if it counted ;-)
What is the result (disk space) in
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:38:22 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
>
> lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-)
That's why I asked if it counted ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
signature.asc
Description: P
Am Montag, 28. August 2006 10:30 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:07:59 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> > It makes me wander if anybody experiment with other file systems
> > (besides dos, ext2) on on memory sticks?
>
> I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
lvmfs? Never
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:07:59 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> It makes me wander if anybody experiment with other file systems
> (besides dos, ext2) on on memory sticks?
I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
--
Neil Bothwick
Beware of the opinion of someone without any facts.
signatu
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 01:23 +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
> On Sunday 27 August 2006 23:59, Joseph wrote:
> > Harm Geerts is right (thanks) "umask=0077" does what I need with dos
> > partition, when mounted, usb stick has a permission 700.
> > What would be an alternative for ext2 file system, umask do
On Sunday 27 August 2006 23:59, Joseph wrote:
> Harm Geerts is right (thanks) "umask=0077" does what I need with dos
> partition, when mounted, usb stick has a permission 700.
> What would be an alternative for ext2 file system, umask doesn't work.
I might be wrong but I'm guessing you want differ
On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:55, Joseph wrote:
> Can someone refresh my memory?
> I'm trying to mount usb memory stick with permission 600 but it is not
> taking devmode=0600
>
> The current command mounts it as 755
> /dev/sda1 /mnt/camera auto
> noauto,rw,users,exec
>
> I've tried
10 matches
Mail list logo
