Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-19 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > OOo has just got to be the most fscked-up ebuild I've ever seen. > > I think you are being unfair towards the gentoo developers. It isn't > the ebuild but OOo's build system (and source). The gentoo devs j

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 05 May 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > OOo has just got to be the most fscked-up ebuild I've ever seen. > > I think you are being unfair towards the gentoo developers. It isn't > the ebuild but OOo's build system (and source). The gentoo devs just

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Monday 05 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > OOo has just got to be the most fscked-up ebuild I've ever seen. I think you are being unfair towards the gentoo developers. It isn't the ebuild but OOo's build system (and source). The gentoo devs just try to work around its extreme fragility. Sti

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 05 May 2008, Francesco Talamona wrote: > > > 2 - how long does it take to compile openoffice-bin > > > on a PC with 2 GB Ram and a AMD Athlon-64 3200+ Processor? > > > > On my 2003 machine (AMD 2500+) 5 hours ; > > on my 2007 machine (Intel Core-2 Duo 6700) 2 hours . > > Those are the t

[gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice

2008-05-05 Thread Francesco Talamona
> > 2 - how long does it take to compile openoffice-bin > > on a PC with 2 GB Ram and a AMD Athlon-64 3200+ Processor? > > On my 2003 machine (AMD 2500+) 5 hours ; > on my 2007 machine (Intel Core-2 Duo 6700) 2 hours . Those are the timings of openoffice, openoffice-bin doesn't get compiled, i