On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:08:48 -0500
reader wrote:
> Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > frankly samba is a mature and stable package. It should work. Perhaps
> > the OP's efforts are better directed at figuring out what is going wrong
> > with samba.
>
> Yes, that was the conclusion I c
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> frankly samba is a mature and stable package. It should work. Perhaps
> the OP's efforts are better directed at figuring out what is going wrong with
> samba.
Yes, that was the conclusion I came to (I'm the OP) as well and have
now gotten it working. It w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Something like an nfs for windows I guess. I've seen that very thing
but it was an ancient non-developed app.
I haven't messed with it at all, but supposedly the Microsoft Services
for UNIX (SFU) is supposed to have NFS capabilitie
Please turn off your html.
Thanks,
festus
--
In all the millions of years dinosaurs roamed this planet, did any of
them feel the need to invent, say, nuclear weapons? Mickeyz
pgp3M1b95hde0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Quag7 wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 18:29 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Michael Crute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there
As far as I know, Windows XP and newer versions of Windows prefer CIFS over SMB. You can't even access a Win2k3 share with samba without CIFS or disabling a server signing in the Win2k3 server.
On 8/11/06, Quag7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 18:29 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>
gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Something like an nfs for windows I guess. I've seen that very thing
>> but it was an ancient non-developed app.
>>
> I haven't messed with it at all, but supposedly the Microsoft Services
> for UNIX (SFU) is supposed to have NFS capabilities.
I installed t
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 18:29 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Michael Crute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there
> >> anything other than samba the works reliably.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Michael Crute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there
>>> anything other than samba the works relia
"Michael Crute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there
>> anything other than samba the works reliably.
>
> HTTP
> FTP
> DAV
> Samba
> SSH/SCP
> (probably others too)
>
> Take y
10 matches
Mail list logo
