On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:06:17 +1100
Gregory Shearman wrote:
> Even if you didn't see the message and your system didn't boot then you
> could still fix things by using your Minimal Install CD to start up,
> then chroot into your normal system and rebuild your kernel.
Well, you could…
But as i dro
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:10:45 -0600
»Q« wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:45:33 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> [about udev and CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y]
> > A news item about this is coming down the wire very soon now (aka
> > within hours judging by the thread on -dev).
>
> It's there now. Among ot
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 20:10:45 »Q« wrote:
> Of course there's no substitute for paying attention, but it's nice to
> get a news item, even nicer if it comes before things hit stable.
Indeed.
--
Peter
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 11:06:17 Gregory Shearman wrote:
> Even if you didn't see the message
...as I didn't...
> and your system didn't boot
...as mine didn't...
> then you could still fix things by using your Minimal Install CD to start
> up, then chroot into your normal system and rebu
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:06:17 +1100, Gregory Shearman wrote:
> > That's fine if you see the message, which you should, and the system
> > does not suffer an unplanned reboot, which it shouldn't. But leaving a
> > system in a state that won't reboot following a crash or power
> > failure is not part
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:45:33 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
[about udev and CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y]
> A news item about this is coming down the wire very soon now (aka
> within hours judging by the thread on -dev).
It's there now. Among other things, it mentions checking the /dev
entry in fstab, if the
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:10:44 +0200
Thanasis wrote:
> on 01/23/2013 04:41 AM »Q« wrote the following:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:57:59 +
> > Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday 20 January 2013 08:51:43 Philip Webb wrote:
> >>> I just tried upgrading to udev-197 , which is supposed to b
on 01/23/2013 01:10 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> on 01/23/2013 04:41 AM »Q« wrote the following:
>> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:57:59 +
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 20 January 2013 08:51:43 Philip Webb wrote:
I just tried upgrading to udev-197 , which is supposed to be
on 01/23/2013 04:41 AM »Q« wrote the following:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:57:59 +
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 20 January 2013 08:51:43 Philip Webb wrote:
>>> I just tried upgrading to udev-197 , which is supposed to be
>>> stable. There were multiple problems & I'm now back with u
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:29:19 +0100, Matthias Hanft wrote:
>
>> Good idea, but as I updated udev yesterday on one of my Gentoo systems,
>> in the usual after-update messages there was a line in red, telling me
>> "You don't have CONFIG_DEVTMPFS enabled. udev will
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:29:19 +0100, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> > This got me too. Now there's a discussion in -dev about making config
> > warnings fatal.
>
> Good idea, but as I updated udev yesterday on one of my Gentoo systems,
> in the usual after-update messages there was a line in red, tell
»Q« wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> My daily update pulled in udev-197-r3. The installation went smoothly
>> but I decided I ought to reboot to check that I could. I couldn't.
>> Udev couldn't start because my kernel config didn't have
>> CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y. So I booted my rescue system on the sa
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:57:59 +
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2013 08:51:43 Philip Webb wrote:
> > I just tried upgrading to udev-197 , which is supposed to be
> > stable. There were multiple problems & I'm now back with udev-171 .
>
> My daily update pulled in udev-197-r3. T
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:36:55PM -0600, Dale wrote
>
>> Well, I have seen servers run for YEARS with no reboots. Most of those
>> admit, they don't upgrade them at all. One several years ago said he
>> hadn't even blew out the dust in that time. It was over 5 years since
>
On Jan 22, 2013 11:07 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:36:55PM -0600, Dale wrote
>
> > Well, I have seen servers run for YEARS with no reboots. Most of those
> > admit, they don't upgrade them at all. One several years ago said he
> > hadn't even blew out the dust in that
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:36:55PM -0600, Dale wrote
> Well, I have seen servers run for YEARS with no reboots. Most of those
> admit, they don't upgrade them at all. One several years ago said he
> hadn't even blew out the dust in that time. It was over 5 years since
> he even logged into it.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:36:55 -0600
Dale wrote:
> Well, I have seen servers run for YEARS with no reboots. Most of
> those admit, they don't upgrade them at all. One several years ago
> said he hadn't even blew out the dust in that time. It was over 5
> years since he even logged into it. He k
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:17:04 -0600
> Dale wrote:
>
>> walt wrote:
>>> On 01/20/2013 01:29 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
just migrated to sys-fs/udev-197 - everything went smoothly and
seems to work. the only observation at this time is absence of
device file /de
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:17:04 -0600
Dale wrote:
> walt wrote:
> > On 01/20/2013 01:29 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
> >> just migrated to sys-fs/udev-197 - everything went smoothly and
> >> seems to work. the only observation at this time is absence of
> >> device file /dev/root whilst both /etc/mta
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:56:01 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
> Then you wouldn't have these problems now. There are 8 or more Gentoo
> boxen running on this LAN with the above and none of the issues that
> come up daily now in this ML.
For completeness, there are seven Gentoo systems here, all but one
r
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:17:04PM -0600, Dale wrote
> Since this appears to be a issue now, I'm switching to eudev.
Welcome to the dark side Luke. I'm in the midst of re-installing
Gentoo on my netbook with eudev instead of mdev. It's working so far,
but I haven't installed all the applicati
Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:17:04PM -0600, Dale wrote:
>>
>> It does here:
>>
>> root@fireball / # ls -al /dev/root
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jan 10 07:12 /dev/root -> sda6
>> root@fireball / #
>>
>> Since this appears to be a issue now, I'm switching to eudev. For some
>> rea
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:17:04PM -0600, Dale wrote:
> walt wrote:
> > On 01/20/2013 01:29 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
> >> just migrated to sys-fs/udev-197 - everything went smoothly and seems to
> >> work. the only observation at this time is absence of device file
> >> /dev/root whilst both /et
walt wrote:
> On 01/20/2013 01:29 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
>> just migrated to sys-fs/udev-197 - everything went smoothly and seems to
>> work. the only observation at this time is absence of device file
>> /dev/root whilst both /etc/mtab and /proc/mounts are referring to that
>> device node:
>>
On 01/20/2013 01:29 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
> just migrated to sys-fs/udev-197 - everything went smoothly and seems to
> work. the only observation at this time is absence of device file
> /dev/root whilst both /etc/mtab and /proc/mounts are referring to that
> device node:
>
> # grep root /et
25 matches
Mail list logo
