>
>> > The main correlation I've seen so far is with dhcpcd. Sometimes at my
>> > work I get a 192. IP (which doesn't work), and other times I get a
>> > 133. IP (which is correct). In fact, sometimes dhcp is giving me an
>> > IP address and resolv.conf related to a university I was visiting like
On 13 October 2010 20:00, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Willie Wong
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:17:02PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:59:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> >
> > The main correlation I've seen so far is with dhcpcd. Sometimes at my
> > work I get a 192. IP (which doesn't work), and other times I get a
> > 133. IP (which is correct). In fact, sometimes dhcp is giving me an
> > IP address and resolv.conf related to a university I was visiting like
> > a
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:38 AM, daid kahl wrote:
>> On 10/11/2010 11:38 PM, daid kahl wrote:
>>
>>> However, I noticed that logins, su, and sudo are all responding
>>> slowly. This was all fixed and fine once I updated my configuration
>>> files, but this week it's acting up again. Before it wa
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:17:02PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:59:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> >
>> >> Seriously, just use wicd, dump the rest.
>> >
>>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:17:02PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:59:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> >> Seriously, just use wicd, dump the rest.
> >
> > +1
>
> Call me old-fashioned, I use wpa_supplicant. :)
Act
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:59:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> Seriously, just use wicd, dump the rest.
>
> +1
Call me old-fashioned, I use wpa_supplicant. :)
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:59:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Seriously, just use wicd, dump the rest.
+1
--
Neil Bothwick
Is that "woof" feed me; "woof" walk me; "woof" there's a burglar? What??
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:50 on Wednesday 13 October 2010, daid kahl
did opine thusly:
> I guess what might be helpful right now is how to purge my networking
> stuff and just start it all from scratch. There is so much garbage
> installed right now so I can hack it together that it's j
On 13 October 2010 22:38, daid kahl wrote:
>> On 10/11/2010 11:38 PM, daid kahl wrote:
>>
>>> However, I noticed that logins, su, and sudo are all responding
>>> slowly. This was all fixed and fine once I updated my configuration
>>> files, but this week it's acting up again. Before it was just
> On 10/11/2010 11:38 PM, daid kahl wrote:
>
>> However, I noticed that logins, su, and sudo are all responding
>> slowly. This was all fixed and fine once I updated my configuration
>> files, but this week it's acting up again. Before it was just su and
>> sudo that I noticed as slow (authentica
On 10/11/2010 11:38 PM, daid kahl wrote:
However, I noticed that logins, su, and sudo are all responding
slowly. This was all fixed and fine once I updated my configuration
files, but this week it's acting up again. Before it was just su and
sudo that I noticed as slow (authentication takes ar
Sorry, so I put pam back to ~x86 version without any further rebuilds,
and I don't notice any trouble, so it doesn't seem related to pam at
all (my email might imply that).
~daid
On 12 October 2010 16:12, daid kahl wrote:
> Hmm, as usual, sending email to the user list makes subsequent guesses
>
Hmm, as usual, sending email to the user list makes subsequent guesses
have good affects.
Hard to say for certain, but at present, pam is on x86, and I rebuild
most the dependencies I could find in the sudo ebuild (seemed a fine
place to start looking for relevant packages, anyway).
(pam 1.1.1-r2
14 matches
Mail list logo
