Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-07 Thread Dale
J. Roeleveld wrote: Dale, juust out of curiosity here. Do you have your CD/DVD drive attached using a SATA-cable? Or using an "older" IDE-cable? I use AHCI in my BIOS and can boot from CD/DVD. But my DVD-drive is a SATA- drive. -- Joost My DVD drive is connected with a SATA cable. It w

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-07 Thread Andrea Conti
Had to boot this morning 5 times, since the root device switched arbitrarily between sde3 and sdg3 Try disabling CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC ("Asynchronous SCSI scanning" under SCSI options). While it is not a solution, this might somewhat reduce the randomness you are experiencing. andrea

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-07 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 13:35:28 Dale wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: > > that approves my tests ... :-/ > > > > Had to boot this morning 5 times, since the root device switched > > arbitrarily between sde3 and sdg3 and I've chosen by bad luck always the > > wrong one. It seems there is also so

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > AFAIK, initramfs is the newer preferred one and it's either one or the other > with initrd being seldom used these days if at all. > > Many people still call it initrd even if int's initramfs in use - sort of a > slang thing > I suspect

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:18 on Wednesday 05 January 2011, Mark Knecht did opine thusly: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Alex Schuster wrote: > > Jörg Schaible writes: > >> Alex Schuster wrote: > >> > I would be surprised if it had this feature. AFAIK grub is already > >> > done at th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Alex Schuster wrote: > Jörg Schaible writes: > >> Alex Schuster wrote: > >> > I would be surprised if it had this feature. AFAIK grub is already done >> > at this stage, the kernel has taken over. And I guess it does not know >> > about the LABEL= syntax, and has no

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Alex Schuster
Jörg Schaible writes: > Alex Schuster wrote: > > I would be surprised if it had this feature. AFAIK grub is already done > > at this stage, the kernel has taken over. And I guess it does not know > > about the LABEL= syntax, and has no code to scan all devices for file > > system labels. > > I f

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Dale
Jörg Schaible wrote: that approves my tests ... :-/ Had to boot this morning 5 times, since the root device switched arbitrarily between sde3 and sdg3 and I've chosen by bad luck always the wrong one. It seems there is also some timing involved regarding the initialization of the available devic

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Alex, Alex Schuster wrote: > Dale writes: > >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, >>> Stroller did opine thusly: >>> I found numerous references to this syntax going back to 2005 or so, and some major distros seem to use it

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36

2011-01-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, >> Stroller did opine thusly: >> >> >>> I found numerous references to this syntax going back to 2005 or >>> so, and some major distros seem to use it as the default way of >>> describi