On Wednesday 24 May 2017 08:58:53 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 23:16:48 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > I, too, was affected by this. I did the libstdc++ rebuild after
> > upgrading
> > gcc (some 550 packages) a while back and now I was hit by the Qt
> > problem,
> > so another rebu
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 23:16:48 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > well, this does not seem to be the complete truth. When I switched to
> > gcc
> > 5.x I did a revdep-rebuild for anything tha
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> well, this does not seem to be the complete truth. When I switched to gcc
> 5.x I did a revdep-rebuild for anything that was compiled against
> libstdc++.so.6 just like the according news entry wa
On Monday 22 May 2017 09:49:01 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Have you seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595618 ? It says
> > that "Qt plugins compiled with gcc-4 are incompatible with
> > > be
> > expected to anticipate that. On the other
Hi Peter,
Peter Humphrey wrote:
[snip]
> Have you seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595618 ? It says
> that "Qt plugins compiled with gcc-4 are incompatible with
> expected to anticipate that. On the other hand, some kind of notice could
> be issued, and bug 618922 is pursuing that.
5 matches
Mail list logo
